Showing 33 of 43 total issues
Method make_tr_attr has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_tr_attr(cell, row, totalrows, header, bordered)Method style_two_regex_not_prev has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def style_two_regex_not_prev(n, text, regex, re_prev, warning)Method clause_etc1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clause_etc1(clause, out, num)
out.div **attr_code(
id: clause["id"],
class: clause.name == "definitions" ? "Symbols" : nil,
) do |div|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method style_two_regex_not_prev has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def style_two_regex_not_prev(n, text, regex, re_prev, warning)
return if text.nil?
arr = Tokenizer::WhitespaceTokenizer.new.tokenize(text)
arr.each_index do |i|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ol_depth has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ol_depth(node)
depth = node.ancestors(@iso_class ? "ol" : "ul, ol").size + 1
type = :alphabet
type = :arabic if [2, 7].include? depth
type = :roman if [3, 8].include? depth- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vocab_terms_titles_validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vocab_terms_titles_validate(root)
terms = root.xpath("//sections/terms | //sections/clause[.//terms]")
if terms.size == 1
((t = terms.first.at("./title")) && (t&.text == @i18n.termsdef)) or
@log.add("Style", terms.first,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method image_name_validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def image_name_validate(xmldoc)
prefix = image_name_prefix(xmldoc) or return
xmldoc.xpath("//image").each do |i|
next if i["src"].start_with?("data:")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method figure_parse1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def figure_parse1(node, out)
measurement_units(node, out)
out.div **figure_attrs(node) do |div|
node.children.each do |n|
n.name == "note" && n["type"] == "units" and next- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method isosubgroup_validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def isosubgroup_validate(root)
root.xpath("//technical-committee/@type").each do |t|
unless %w{TC PC JTC JPC}.include? t.text
@log.add("Document Attributes", nil,
"invalid technical committee type #{t}")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method style_list_iso has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def style_list_iso(elem, level, listtype, idx)
return idx if elem.at(".//ol | .//ul") && !elem.at("./p")
idx += 1
ol = elem.xpath("./ancestor::ol")&.last- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method note_continued_style has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def note_continued_style(docxml)
docxml.xpath("//div[@class = 'Note']").each do |d|
d.xpath("./p").each_with_index do |p, i|
p["class"] && p["class"] != "Note" and next
p["class"] = (i.zero? ? "Note" : "Notecontinued")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method xrefs_mandate_validate1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xrefs_mandate_validate1(xmldoc, xpath, name)
exc = %w(table note example figure).map { |x| "//#{x}#{xpath}" }
.join(" | ")
(xmldoc.xpath(xpath) - xmldoc.xpath(exc)).each do |x|
x["unnumbered"] == "true" and next- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method example_continued_style has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def example_continued_style(docxml)
docxml.xpath("//div[@class = 'Example']").each do |d|
d.xpath("./p").each_with_index do |p, i|
p["class"] && p["class"] != "Example" and next
p["class"] = (i.zero? ? "Example" : "Examplecontinued")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"