Showing 88 of 88 total issues
Method isorefmatches3_1
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def isorefmatches3_1(xml, match, code, year, _hasyr, _ref)
Method dl_bib_extract
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dl_bib_extract(clause, nested = false)
dl = clause.at("./dl") or return
key = ""
bib = dl.xpath("./dt | ./dd").each_with_object({}) do |dtd, m|
(dtd.name == "dt" and key = dtd.text.sub(/:+$/, "")) and next
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method strip_header
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def strip_header(lines)
return { lines: lines, hdr: nil } unless !lines.empty? &&
lines.first.start_with?("= ")
skip = true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method pop_floating_title
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pop_floating_title(xmldoc)
loop do
found = false
xmldoc.xpath("//floating-title").each do |t|
t.next_element.nil? or next
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method uninterrupt_quotes_around_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def uninterrupt_quotes_around_xml(xmldoc)
xmldoc.traverse do |n|
next unless n.text? && n&.previous&.element?
next if uninterrupt_quotes_around_xml_skip(n)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method isorefrender1
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def isorefrender1(bib, match, code, year, allp = "")
Method output
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def output(isodoc_node, inname, outname, format, options = {})
Method progress_conv
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def progress_conv(idx, step, total, threshold, msg)
Method merge_by_type1
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_by_type1(old, new, field, attributes, opt)
Method norm_id_memorize
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def norm_id_memorize(node, res_table, selector, prefix, use_domain)
Method merge_by_type
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_by_type(old, new, field, attributes, opt = {})
Method organization
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def organization(org, orgname, node = nil, default_org = nil, attrs = {})
Method norm_id_memorize_init
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def norm_id_memorize_init(node, res_table, selector, prefix, use_domain)
Method table_tracker_update
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def table_tracker_update(cells2d, row, curr, rowspan, colspan)
Method term_defs_boilerplate
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def term_defs_boilerplate(div, source, term, _preface, isodoc)
Method ref_dl_cleanup
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ref_dl_cleanup(xmldoc)
xmldoc.xpath("//clause[@bibitem = 'true']").each do |c|
bib = dl_bib_extract(c) or next
validate_ref_dl(bib, c)
bibitemxml = RelatonBib::BibliographicItem.from_hash(bib).to_xml or next
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method modify_ref_node
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def modify_ref_node(node, target)
node.name = "xref"
s = @lookup[:symbol][target]
t1 = @lookup[:sec2prim][target] and target = norm_ref_id1(t1)
t = @lookup[:term][target]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method note_cleanup
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def note_cleanup(xmldoc)
xmldoc.xpath("//note").each do |n|
n["keep-separate"] == "true" || !n.ancestors("table").empty? and next
prev = n.previous_element || next
n.parent = prev if ELEMS_ALLOW_NOTES.include? prev.name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method png_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def png_validate(doc)
doc.xpath("//image[@mimetype = 'image/png']").each do |i|
Vectory::Utils::url?(i["src"]) and next
decoded = if Vectory::Utils::datauri?(i["src"])
Vectory::Utils::decode_datauri(i["src"])[:data]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def figure_dl_cleanup2(xmldoc)
q = "//figure/following-sibling::*[self::p]"
xmldoc.xpath(q).each do |s|
if s.text =~ /^\s*key[^a-z]*$/i && s&.next_element&.name == "dl"
s.next_element["key"] = "true"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76