Showing 92 of 92 total issues
Assignment Branch Condition size for clean_channel_messages is too high. [47.1/15] Open
def clean_channel_messages(channel_id, user_id, end_point)
has_more = true
while has_more
res = Slack.public_send(end_point, channel: channel_id, oldest: start_time, latest: end_time)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method clean_channel_messages
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clean_channel_messages(channel_id, user_id, end_point)
has_more = true
while has_more
res = Slack.public_send(end_point, channel: channel_id, oldest: start_time, latest: end_time)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [24/10] Open
def clean_channel_messages(channel_id, user_id, end_point)
has_more = true
while has_more
res = Slack.public_send(end_point, channel: channel_id, oldest: start_time, latest: end_time)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for get_channel_id is too high. [29.83/15] Open
def get_channel_id
if args.channel
@channel_type = 'channel'
channel_id = dict.find_channel_id(args.channel)
elsif args.direct
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for clean_channel_file is too high. [25.71/15] Open
def clean_channel_file(channel_id, user_id)
page, total_page = 0, nil
until page == total_page
page += 1
res = Slack.files_list(page: page, channel: channel_id, types: args.file, ts_from: start_time, ts_to: end_time)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Cyclomatic complexity for clean_channel_messages is too high. [13/6] Open
def clean_channel_messages(channel_id, user_id, end_point)
has_more = true
while has_more
res = Slack.public_send(end_point, channel: channel_id, oldest: start_time, latest: end_time)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Assignment Branch Condition size for run is too high. [22.2/15] Open
def run
logger.info "Running slack_neuralyzer v#{SlackNeuralyzer::VERSION}\n"
sleep(1)
if args.show
puts dict.show_all_channels
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Perceived complexity for clean_channel_messages is too high. [13/7] Open
def clean_channel_messages(channel_id, user_id, end_point)
has_more = true
while has_more
res = Slack.public_send(end_point, channel: channel_id, oldest: start_time, latest: end_time)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method has too many lines. [16/10] Open
def get_channel_id
if args.channel
@channel_type = 'channel'
channel_id = dict.find_channel_id(args.channel)
elsif args.direct
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for show_all_channels is too high. [20.02/15] Open
def show_all_channels
text = ''
text << light_blue("All user direct:\n")
text << list_names(users)
text << light_blue("\nAll channels (public):\n")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for delete_file is too high. [19.26/15] Open
def delete_file(file)
file_time = time_format(file['timestamp'])
file_url = light_magenta("(#{file['permalink']})")
delete = delete_format
Slack.files_delete(file: file['id']) if args.execute
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def clean_channel_file(channel_id, user_id)
page, total_page = 0, nil
until page == total_page
page += 1
res = Slack.files_list(page: page, channel: channel_id, types: args.file, ts_from: start_time, ts_to: end_time)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for clean_channel_file is too high. [7/6] Open
def clean_channel_file(channel_id, user_id)
page, total_page = 0, nil
until page == total_page
page += 1
res = Slack.files_list(page: page, channel: channel_id, types: args.file, ts_from: start_time, ts_to: end_time)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Assignment Branch Condition size for finish_text is too high. [16.31/15] Open
def finish_text(type)
text = "\n#{light_green(counter)} #{type}(s) in #{current_channel} "
if args.execute.nil? && counter.nonzero?
text << 'will be deleted.'
text << light_red("\nNow, you can rerun the command and use `-e | --execute` to actually delete the #{type}(s).")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method clean_channel_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clean_channel_file(channel_id, user_id)
page, total_page = 0, nil
until page == total_page
page += 1
res = Slack.files_list(page: page, channel: channel_id, types: args.file, ts_from: start_time, ts_to: end_time)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def init_users_dict
res = Slack.users_list
raise SlackApi::Errors::ResponseError, res['error'] unless res['ok']
members = res['members']
members.each { |member| @users[member['id']] = member['name'] }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def init_channels_dict
res = Slack.channels_list
raise SlackApi::Errors::ResponseError, res['error'] unless res['ok']
channels = res['channels']
channels.each { |channel| @channels[channel['id']] = channel['name'] }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def init_ims_dict
res = Slack.im_list
raise SlackApi::Errors::ResponseError, res['error'] unless res['ok']
ims = res['ims']
ims.each { |im| @ims[im['id']] = im['user'] }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def init_mpims_dict
res = Slack.mpim_list
raise SlackApi::Errors::ResponseError, res['error'] unless res['ok']
mpims = res['groups']
mpims.each { |mpim| @mpims[mpim['id']] = mpim['name'] }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method get_channel_id
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_channel_id
if args.channel
@channel_type = 'channel'
channel_id = dict.find_channel_id(args.channel)
elsif args.direct
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"