Showing 327 of 327 total issues
Function createApplicationEntry
has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createApplicationEntry (
subject: NamedNode,
origin: NamedNode | null,
appModes: NamedNode[],
updateTable: () => void
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var hasContentTypeIn = function (kb, x, displayables) {
var cts = kb.fetcher.getHeader(x, 'content-type')
if (cts) {
for (var j = 0; j < cts.length; j++) {
for (var k = 0; k < displayables.length; k++) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var hasContentTypeIn = function (kb, x, displayables) {
var cts = kb.fetcher.getHeader(x, 'content-type')
if (cts) {
for (var j = 0; j < cts.length; j++) {
for (var k = 0; k < displayables.length; k++) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function renderPaneIconTray
has 115 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function renderPaneIconTray (td, options = {}) {
const paneShownStyle =
'width: 24px; border-radius: 0.5em; border-top: solid #222 1px; border-left: solid #222 0.1em; border-bottom: solid #eee 0.1em; border-right: solid #eee 0.1em; margin-left: 1em; padding: 3px; background-color: #ffd;'
const paneHiddenStyle =
'width: 24px; border-radius: 0.5em; margin-left: 1em; padding: 3px'
Function Refill
has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Refill: function Refill (e, selectedTd) {
UI.log.info('Refill' + selectedTd.textContent)
var isPredicate = selectedTd.nextSibling
var predicateQuery
if (isPredicate) {
Function initializeNewInstanceAtBase
has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var initializeNewInstanceAtBase = function (
thisInstance: any,
newBase: string
) {
var here = sym(thisInstance.uri.split('#')[0])
Function QuerySource
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function QuerySource () {
/**
* stores all of the queries currently held by this source,
* indexed by ID number.
*/
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function render
has 107 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
render: function (subject, context) {
const myDocument = context.dom
function isVideo (src, _index) {
if (!src) {
return {
Function calculations
has 107 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var calculations = function () {
var total = {}
var yearTotal = {}
var yearCategoryTotal = {}
var trans = kb.each(undefined, TRIP('trip'), subject)
Function showNobj
has 105 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
tr.showNobj = function (n) {
var predDups = k - dups
var show = 2 * n < predDups ? n : predDups
var showLaterArray = []
if (predDups !== 1) {
Function makeQueryRow
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function makeQueryRow (q, tr, constraint) {
var kb = UI.store
// predtr = predParentOf(tr)
// var nodes = tr.childNodes
// var n = tr.childNodes.length
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function render
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
render: function (subject, context) {
const myDocument = context.dom
var kb = context.store
var ns = UI.ns
var CAL = $rdf.Namespace('http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical#')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function insertTermTo
has 101 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
insertTermTo: function insertTermTo (selectedTd, term, isObject) {
switch (selectedTd.className) {
case 'undetermined selected':
var defaultpropview = this.views.defaults[
selectedTd.parentNode.AJAR_statement.predicate.uri
Function render
has 99 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
render: function (subject, context) {
const myDocument = context.dom
var kb = context.store
var ns = UI.ns
var CAL = $rdf.Namespace('http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical#')
Function mbSubmitPost
has 99 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var mbSubmitPost = function () {
var meta = {
recipients: []
}
// user has selected a microblog to post to
Function render
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
render: function (subject, context) {
const dom = context.dom
const store = context.session.store
const canonizedSubject = store.canon(subject)
const types = store.findTypeURIs(canonizedSubject)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
label: function (subject, context) {
var kb = context.session.store
var typeURIs = kb.findTypeURIs(subject)
var prefix = $rdf.Util.mediaTypeClass('audio/*').uri.split('*')[0]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
label: function (subject, context) {
var kb = context.session.store
var typeURIs = kb.findTypeURIs(subject)
var prefix = $rdf.Util.mediaTypeClass('video/*').uri.split('*')[0]
for (var t in typeURIs) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.selectAll = function () {
var i
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
this.display.document.checkboxes.elements[i].checked = true
this.references[i].checked = true
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.deselectAll = function () {
var i
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
this.display.document.checkboxes.elements[i].checked = false
this.references[i].checked = false
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76