Sign upLogin

microting/eform-sdk-dotnet

View on GitHub
Star
eFormCore/Handlers/EformCompletedHandler.cs

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method SaveResult has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        private async Task<int> SaveResult(Response resp, string respXml, MicrotingDbContext dbContext,
            int microtingUid, int? checkIdLastKnown, CaseDto aCase)
        {
            XmlDocument xDoc = new XmlDocument();
Severity: Major
Found in eFormCore/Handlers/EformCompletedHandler.cs - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method CheckStatusByMicrotingUid has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            private async Task<bool> CheckStatusByMicrotingUid(int microtingUid)
        {
            await using MicrotingDbContext dbContext = _core.DbContextHelper.GetDbContext();
            List<CaseDto> lstCase = new List<CaseDto>();
    Severity: Major
    Found in eFormCore/Handlers/EformCompletedHandler.cs - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method CheckStatusByMicrotingUid has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              private async Task<bool> CheckStatusByMicrotingUid(int microtingUid)
        {
            await using MicrotingDbContext dbContext = _core.DbContextHelper.GetDbContext();
            List<CaseDto> lstCase = new List<CaseDto>();
      Severity: Minor
      Found in eFormCore/Handlers/EformCompletedHandler.cs - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method SaveResult has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              private async Task<int> SaveResult(Response resp, string respXml, MicrotingDbContext dbContext,
            int microtingUid, int? checkIdLastKnown, CaseDto aCase)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in eFormCore/Handlers/EformCompletedHandler.cs - About 45 mins to fix

        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
        Open

                                    if (resp.Checks.Count > 0)
                            {
                                await SaveResult(resp, respXml, dbContext, microtingUid, null, aCase)
                                    .ConfigureAwait(false);
                                noResults = false;
        Severity: Major
        Found in eFormCore/Handlers/EformCompletedHandler.cs - About 45 mins to fix

          Method FetchData has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  private bool FetchData(string microtingUid, CaseDto concreteCase, string checkIdLastKnown, ref string respXml,
            ref Response resp)
          Severity: Minor
          Found in eFormCore/Handlers/EformCompletedHandler.cs - About 35 mins to fix

            Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        catch (Exception ex)
            {
                await _sqlController.NotificationUpdate(message.NotificationUId, message.MicrotringUUID,
                    Constants.WorkflowStates.NotFound, ex.Message, ex.StackTrace);
                NoteDto noteDto = new NoteDto(message.NotificationUId, message.MicrotringUUID,
            Severity: Major
            Found in eFormCore/Handlers/EformCompletedHandler.cs and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            eFormCore/Handlers/EformRetrievedHandler.cs on lines 64..71
            eFormCore/Handlers/UnitActivatedHandler.cs on lines 66..73

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 102.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status