microting/eform-sdk-dotnet

View on GitHub
eFormCore/Migrations/20201231062732_ChangingDescriptToLanguageCode.Designer.cs

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 mos
Test Coverage

Method BuildTargetModel has 2762 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        protected override void BuildTargetModel(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
        {
#pragma warning disable 612, 618
            modelBuilder
                .HasAnnotation("ProductVersion", "3.1.8")

    File 20201231062732_ChangingDescriptToLanguageCode.Designer.cs has 2777 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    using System;
    using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
    using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Infrastructure;
    using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Migrations;
    using Microting.eForm.Infrastructure;

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      using System;
      using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
      using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Infrastructure;
      using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Migrations;
      using Microting.eForm.Infrastructure;
      eFormCore/Migrations/20201225165255_FixingBrokenTableNames.Designer.cs on lines 3..3946

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 34346.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status