Method `SubscriberThread` has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        private void SubscriberThread()
        {
            var token = _sqlController.SettingRead(Settings.token).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
            if (token != "UNIT_TEST___________________L:32" && token != "abc1234567890abc1234567890abcdef")
            {

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 4 hrs to fix

Method `SubscriberThread` has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        private void SubscriberThread()
        {
            var token = _sqlController.SettingRead(Settings.token).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
            if (token != "UNIT_TEST___________________L:32" && token != "abc1234567890abc1234567890abcdef")
            {

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 2 hrs to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                                    case Constants.Notifications.UnitActivate:
                                        _sqlController.NotificationCreate(notificationUId, microtingUId,
                                            Constants.Notifications.UnitActivate).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
                                        _bus.SendLocal(new UnitActivated(notificationUId, microtingUId)).GetAwaiter()
                                            .GetResult();

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 45 mins to fix

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                                    case Constants.Notifications.InSightSurveyConfigurationChanged:
                                    case Constants.Notifications.InSightSurveyConfigurationCreated:
                                        _sqlController.NotificationCreate(notificationUId, microtingUId,
                                                Constants.Notifications.InSightSurveyConfigurationChanged).GetAwaiter()
                                            .GetResult();

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 45 mins to fix

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                                    case Constants.Notifications.EformParsedByServer:
                                        _bus.SendLocal(new EformParsedByServer(notificationUId, microtingUId))
                                            .GetAwaiter().GetResult();
                                        break;

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 45 mins to fix

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                                    case Constants.Notifications.Completed:
                                        _sqlController.NotificationCreate(notificationUId, microtingUId,
                                            Constants.Notifications.Completed).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
                                        _bus.SendLocal(new EformCompleted(notificationUId, microtingUId)).GetAwaiter()
                                            .GetResult();

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 45 mins to fix

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                                    case Constants.Notifications.EformParsingError:
                                        _bus.SendLocal(new EformParsingError(notificationUId, microtingUId))
                                            .GetAwaiter().GetResult();
                                        break;

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 45 mins to fix

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                                    case Constants.Notifications.InSightAnswerDone:
                                        _sqlController.NotificationCreate(notificationUId, microtingUId,
                                            Constants.Notifications.InSightAnswerDone).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
                                        _bus.SendLocal(new AnswerCompleted(notificationUId, microtingUId)).GetAwaiter()
                                            .GetResult();

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 45 mins to fix

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                                    case Constants.Notifications.SpeechToTextCompleted:
                                        _sqlController.NotificationCreate(notificationUId, microtingUId,
                                            Constants.Notifications.SpeechToTextCompleted).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
                                        _bus.SendLocal(new TranscriptionCompleted(notificationUId, microtingUId))
                                            .GetAwaiter().GetResult();

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 45 mins to fix

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                                    case Constants.Notifications.RetrievedForm:
                                        _sqlController.NotificationCreate(notificationUId, microtingUId,
                                            Constants.Notifications.RetrievedForm).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
                                        _bus.SendLocal(new EformRetrieved(notificationUId, microtingUId)).GetAwaiter()
                                            .GetResult();

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs - About 45 mins to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                                    case Constants.Notifications.Completed:
                                        _sqlController.NotificationCreate(notificationUId, microtingUId,
                                            Constants.Notifications.Completed).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
                                        _bus.SendLocal(new EformCompleted(notificationUId, microtingUId)).GetAwaiter()
                                            .GetResult();

Found in eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs and 4 other locations - About 55 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs on lines 169..174

eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs on lines 175..180

eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs on lines 181..186

eFormCore/Services/Subscriber.cs on lines 187..192

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 84.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 84.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 84.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 84.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 84.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

microting/eform-sdk-dotnet

Summary

Maintainability

Test Coverage

Method SubscriberThread has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

Method SubscriberThread has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open

Cognitive Complexity

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Further reading

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category

Status

Method `SubscriberThread` has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Method `SubscriberThread` has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open