microting/eform-sdk-dotnet

View on GitHub
eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Method Units_Update_DoesUpdate has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        [Test]
        public async Task Units_Update_DoesUpdate()
        {
            //Arrange

Severity: Major
Found in eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method Units_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            [Test]
            public async Task Units_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved()
            {
                //Arrange
    
    
    Severity: Major
    Found in eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method Units_Create_DoesCreate has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              [Test]
              public async Task Units_Create_DoesCreate()
              {
                  //Arrange
      
      
      Severity: Major
      Found in eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs - About 2 hrs to fix

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    Unit unit = new Unit
                    {
                        CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                        MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                        OtpCode = rnd.Next(1, 255),
        Severity: Major
        Found in eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
        eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs on lines 133..145
        eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs on lines 240..252

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 156.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    Unit unit = new Unit
                    {
                        CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                        MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                        OtpCode = rnd.Next(1, 255),
        Severity: Major
        Found in eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
        eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs on lines 55..67
        eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs on lines 133..145

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 156.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    Unit unit = new Unit
                    {
                        CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                        MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                        OtpCode = rnd.Next(1, 255),
        Severity: Major
        Found in eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
        eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs on lines 55..67
        eFormSDK.Base.Tests/UnitsUTest.cs on lines 240..252

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 156.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status