microting/eform-sdk-dotnet

View on GitHub
eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage

File CasesUTest.cs has 542 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
Severity: Major
Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs - About 1 day to fix

    Method Cases_Update_DoesUpdate has 205 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            [Test]
            public async Task Cases_Update_DoesUpdate()
            {
                //Arrange
    
    
    Severity: Major
    Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs - About 1 day to fix

      Method Cases_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved has 171 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              [Test]
              public async Task Cases_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved()
              {
                  //Arrange
      
      
      Severity: Major
      Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs - About 6 hrs to fix

        Method Cases_Create_DoesCreate has 144 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                [Test]
                public async Task Cases_Create_DoesCreate()
                {
                    //Arrange
        
        
        Severity: Major
        Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs - About 5 hrs to fix

          Similar blocks of code found in 18 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      CheckList checklist = new CheckList
                      {
                          Color = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Custom = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Description = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 17 other locations - About 7 hrs to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 249..280
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 485..516
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 59..90
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 157..188
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 274..305
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 79..110
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 220..251
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 377..408
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 52..83
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 223..254
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 496..527
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 66..97
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 297..328
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 567..598
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 66..97
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 305..336
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 642..673

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 501.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 18 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      CheckList checklist = new CheckList
                      {
                          Color = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Custom = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Description = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 17 other locations - About 7 hrs to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 79..110
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 249..280
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 59..90
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 157..188
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 274..305
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 79..110
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 220..251
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 377..408
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 52..83
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 223..254
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 496..527
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 66..97
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 297..328
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 567..598
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 66..97
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 305..336
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 642..673

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 501.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 18 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      CheckList checklist = new CheckList
                      {
                          Color = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Custom = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Description = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 17 other locations - About 7 hrs to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 79..110
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 485..516
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 59..90
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 157..188
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListSitesUTest.cs on lines 274..305
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 79..110
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 220..251
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 377..408
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 52..83
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 223..254
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListsUTest.cs on lines 496..527
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 66..97
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 297..328
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 567..598
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 66..97
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 305..336
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 642..673

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 501.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Case theCase = new Case
                      {
                          Custom = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Status = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          Type = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 8 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 113..136
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 283..306
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 113..136
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 254..277
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 411..434
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 162..185
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 393..416
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 663..686

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 308.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Case theCase = new Case
                      {
                          Custom = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Status = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          Type = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 8 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 283..306
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 519..542
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 113..136
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 254..277
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 411..434
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 162..185
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 393..416
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 663..686

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 308.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Case theCase = new Case
                      {
                          Custom = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          Status = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          Type = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 8 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 113..136
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 519..542
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 113..136
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 254..277
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 411..434
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 162..185
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 393..416
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 663..686

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 308.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Worker worker = new Worker
                      {
                          Email = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          FirstName = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          LastName = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 8 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 238..246
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 474..482
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 68..76
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 209..217
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 366..374
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 151..159
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 382..390
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 652..660

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 87.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Worker worker = new Worker
                      {
                          Email = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          FirstName = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          LastName = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 8 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 68..76
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 238..246
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 68..76
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 209..217
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 366..374
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 151..159
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 382..390
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 652..660

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 87.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Worker worker = new Worker
                      {
                          Email = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          FirstName = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
                          LastName = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 8 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 68..76
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 474..482
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 68..76
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 209..217
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 366..374
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 151..159
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 382..390
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 652..660

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 87.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 30 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Unit unit = new Unit
                      {
                          CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          OtpCode = rnd.Next(1, 255),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 29 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 229..235
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 465..471
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 59..65
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 200..206
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 357..363
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 57..63
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 288..294
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 558..564
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 57..63
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 296..302
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 633..639
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 63..69
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 235..241
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 425..431
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs on lines 323..329
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 78..84
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 166..172
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 281..287
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 290..296
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 430..436
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 439..445
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 575..581
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 584..590
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 724..730
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 733..739
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 843..849
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 76..82
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 154..160
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 253..259

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 72.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 30 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Unit unit = new Unit
                      {
                          CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          OtpCode = rnd.Next(1, 255),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 29 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 59..65
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 465..471
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 59..65
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 200..206
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 357..363
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 57..63
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 288..294
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 558..564
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 57..63
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 296..302
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 633..639
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 63..69
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 235..241
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 425..431
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs on lines 323..329
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 78..84
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 166..172
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 281..287
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 290..296
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 430..436
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 439..445
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 575..581
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 584..590
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 724..730
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 733..739
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 843..849
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 76..82
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 154..160
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 253..259

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 72.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 30 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Unit unit = new Unit
                      {
                          CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                          OtpCode = rnd.Next(1, 255),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs and 29 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 59..65
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 229..235
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 59..65
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 200..206
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 357..363
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 57..63
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 288..294
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 558..564
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 57..63
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 296..302
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 633..639
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 63..69
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 235..241
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 425..431
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs on lines 323..329
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 78..84
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 166..172
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 281..287
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 290..296
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 430..436
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 439..445
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 575..581
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 584..590
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 724..730
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 733..739
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 843..849
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 76..82
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 154..160
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 253..259

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 72.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status