Sign upLogin

microting/eform-sdk-dotnet

View on GitHub
Star
eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method Answer_update_DoesUpdate has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        [Test]
        public async Task Answer_update_DoesUpdate()
        {
            Random rnd = new Random();
Severity: Major
Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs - About 4 hrs to fix

    Method Answer_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved has 107 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            [Test]
        public async Task Answer_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved()
        {
            //Arrange
    Severity: Major
    Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs - About 4 hrs to fix

      File AnswersUTest.cs has 333 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
      Severity: Minor
      Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs - About 4 hrs to fix

        Method Answers_Create_DoesCreate has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                [Test]
        public async Task Answers_Create_DoesCreate()
        {
            //Arrange
            Random rnd = new Random();
        Severity: Major
        Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs - About 3 hrs to fix

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Answer answer = new Answer
            {
                AnswerDuration = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                FinishedAt = DateTime.UtcNow,
                LanguageId = language.Id,
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 461..473

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 97.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Answer answer = new Answer
            {
                AnswerDuration = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                FinishedAt = DateTime.UtcNow,
                LanguageId = language.Id,
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 271..282

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 93.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 30 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Unit unit = new Unit
            {
                CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                OtpCode = rnd.Next(1, 255),
          Severity: Major
          Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs and 29 other locations - About 40 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 59..65
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 229..235
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CasesUTest.cs on lines 465..471
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 59..65
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 200..206
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/CheckListValuesUTest.cs on lines 357..363
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 57..63
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 288..294
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldValuesUTest.cs on lines 558..564
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 57..63
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 296..302
          eFormSDK.CheckLists.Tests/FieldsUTest.cs on lines 633..639
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 63..69
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 235..241
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswerValuesUTest.cs on lines 425..431
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 78..84
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 166..172
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 281..287
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 290..296
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 430..436
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 439..445
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 575..581
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 584..590
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 724..730
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 733..739
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionTranslationUTest.cs on lines 843..849
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 76..82
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 154..160
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/OptionsUTest.cs on lines 253..259

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 72.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Unit unit = new Unit
            {
                SiteId = siteForUnit.Id,
                CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
          Severity: Minor
          Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs on lines 180..186

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 72.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      Unit unit = new Unit
            {
                SiteId = siteForUnit.Id,
                CustomerNo = rnd.Next(1, 255),
                MicrotingUid = rnd.Next(1, 255),
          Severity: Minor
          Found in eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
          eFormSDK.InSight.Tests/AnswersUTest.cs on lines 62..68

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 72.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status