microting/eform-sdk-dotnet

View on GitHub
eFormSDK.Integration.Base.SqlControllerTests/SqlControllerTestSiteWorker.cs

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method SQL_SiteWorker_SiteWorkerRead_ReadsSiteWorker has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        [Test]
        public async Task SQL_SiteWorker_SiteWorkerRead_ReadsSiteWorker()
        {
            // Arrance

    Method SQL_SiteWorker_SiteWorkerUpdate_UpdatesSiteWorker has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            [Test]
            public async Task SQL_SiteWorker_SiteWorkerUpdate_UpdatesSiteWorker()
            {
                // Arrance
    
    

      Method SQL_SiteWorker_SiteWorkerCreate_ReturnsID has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              [Test]
              public async Task SQL_SiteWorker_SiteWorkerCreate_ReturnsID()
              {
                  // Arrance
      
      

        Method SQL_SiteWorker_SiteWorkerDelete_DeletesSiteWorker has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                [Test]
                public async Task SQL_SiteWorker_SiteWorkerDelete_DeletesSiteWorker()
                {
                    // Arrance
        
        

          Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  public override async Task DoSetup()
                  {
                      DbContextHelper dbContextHelper = new DbContextHelper(ConnectionString);
                      SqlController sql = new SqlController(dbContextHelper);
                      await sql.SettingUpdate(Settings.token, "abc1234567890abc1234567890abcdef");
          eFormSDK.Integration.Base.SqlControllerTests/SqlControllerTestSite.cs on lines 26..43
          eFormSDK.Integration.Base.SqlControllerTests/SqlControllerTestUnit.cs on lines 27..44

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 276.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status