File CoreTesteFormCreateInDB.cs
has 2047 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
Method Core_eForm_OptionsWithMicrotingFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 472 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_OptionsWithMicrotingFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eForm_MultiLvleFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 159 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_MultiLvleFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleSingleSelectFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 146 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleSingleSelectFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eForm_SimpleMultiSelectFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 144 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleMultiSelectFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eForm_SimpleFieldGroupsFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 116 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleFieldGroupsFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eForm_SimplePictureAndSignatureFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePictureAndSignatureFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleNumberFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleNumberFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eForm_SimpleCommenteFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Core_Template_TemplateFromXml_ReturnsTemplate()
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleCommenteFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleTextSingleLineFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Text
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTextSingleLineFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eFormSimpleTextMultiLineFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Comment
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTextMultiLineFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eForm_SimpleDateFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleDateFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleCheckBoxFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleCheckBoxFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eForm_SimplePdfFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePdfFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleTimerFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTimerFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eForm_SimplePictureFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePictureFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleSaveButtonFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleSaveButtonFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eFormSimpleInfoboxFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleInfoboxFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Class CoreTesteFormCreateInDB
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Parallelizable(ParallelScope.Fixtures)]
[TestFixture]
public class CoreTesteFormCreateInDB : DbTestFixture
{
private Core sut;
Method DoSetup
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public override async Task DoSetup()
{
#region Setup SettingsTableContent
DbContextHelper dbContextHelper = new DbContextHelper(ConnectionString);
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Comment
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTextMultiLineFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1040.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Text
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTextSingleLineFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1040.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleCheckBoxFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 968.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleDateFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 968.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTimerFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 932.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePictureFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 932.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleSaveButtonFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 896.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleInfoboxFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 896.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76