File CoreTesteFormFromXML.cs
has 1904 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
Method Core_eForm_OptionsWithMicrotingFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 452 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_OptionsWithMicrotingFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eForm_MultiLvleFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 153 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_MultiLvleFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleSingleSelectFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 143 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleSingleSelectFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eForm_SimpleMultiSelectFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 134 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleMultiSelectFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eForm_SimpleFieldGroupsFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleFieldGroupsFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eForm_SimplePictureAndSignatureFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePictureAndSignatureFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eForm_SimpleCommenteFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Core_Template_TemplateFromXml_ReturnsTemplate()
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleCommenteFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleNumberFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleNumberFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eFormSimpleTextSingleLineFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Text
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTextSingleLineFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eFormSimpleTextMultiLineFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Comment
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTextMultiLineFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Class CoreTesteFormFromXML
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Parallelizable(ParallelScope.Fixtures)]
[TestFixture]
public class CoreTesteFormFromXML : DbTestFixture
{
private Core sut;
Method Core_eForm_SimpleDateFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleDateFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleTimerFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTimerFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eForm_SimplePdfFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePdfFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleCheckBoxFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleCheckBoxFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eForm_SimplePictureFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePictureFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleSaveButtonFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleSaveButtonFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eFormSimpleInfoboxFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleInfoboxFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method DoSetup
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public override async Task DoSetup()
{
#region Setup SettingsTableContent
DbContextHelper dbContextHelper = new DbContextHelper(ConnectionString);
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleCheckBoxFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 658.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTimerFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 658.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleDateFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 658.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleSaveButtonFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 629.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePictureFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 629.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public override async Task DoSetup()
{
#region Setup SettingsTableContent
DbContextHelper dbContextHelper = new DbContextHelper(ConnectionString);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 390.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76