Showing 3,203 of 3,219 total issues
Method Down
has 184 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected override void Down(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
{
migrationBuilder.DropTable(
name: "CheckLisTranslations");
File AnswerValuesUTest.cs
has 470 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
Method SQL_Unit_UnitGetAll_ReturnsAllUnits
has 175 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Unit_UnitGetAll_ReturnsAllUnits()
{
// Arrance
Class Communicator
has 50 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class Communicator
{
#region var
//SqlController sqlController;
Method MoveTranslations
has 173 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static async Task MoveTranslations(MicrotingDbContext dbContext)
{
try
{
List<Field> fields = await dbContext.Fields.ToListAsync();
Method Cases_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved
has 171 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Cases_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved()
{
//Arrange
Class IHttp
has 49 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
internal interface IHttp
{
Task<string> Post(string xmlData, string siteId, string contentType = "application/xml");
Task<string> Status(string elementId, string siteId);
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
modelBuilder.Entity("Microting.eForm.Infrastructure.Data.Entities.WorkerVersion", b =>
{
b.Property<int>("Id")
.ValueGeneratedOnAdd()
.HasColumnType("int");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 434.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
modelBuilder.Entity("Microting.eForm.Infrastructure.Data.Entities.WorkerVersion", b =>
{
b.Property<int>("Id")
.ValueGeneratedOnAdd()
.HasColumnType("int");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 434.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Migrations;
#nullable disable
namespace Microting.eForm.Migrations
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 433.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Migrations;
namespace Microting.eForm.Migrations
{
public partial class CLAttributes : Migration
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 433.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File 20201223104631_AddingTranslations.cs
has 445 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
using System;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Metadata;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Migrations;
namespace Microting.eForm.Migrations
Method SQL_Unit_UnitRead_ReadsUnit
has 166 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Unit_UnitRead_ReadsUnit()
{
// Arrance
Method SQL_Template_TemplateFieldReadAll_ReturnsFieldList
has 165 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Template_TemplateFieldReadAll_ReturnsFieldList()
{
// Arrance
Method Core_AdvancedTemplate_Advanced_TemplateFieldReadAll_returnslistofids
has 165 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_AdvancedTemplate_Advanced_TemplateFieldReadAll_returnslistofids()
{
#region Templates
Method SQL_Unit_UnitUpdate_UpdatesUnit
has 165 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Unit_UnitUpdate_UpdatesUnit()
{
// Arrance
Method SQL_Unit_UnitDelete_DeletesUnit
has 165 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Unit_UnitDelete_DeletesUnit()
{ // Arrance
#region Arrance
Method SQL_answerValues_Update_DoesUpdate
has 162 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_answerValues_Update_DoesUpdate()
{
// Arrange
Random rnd = new Random();
Method Core_eForm_MultiLvleFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 159 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_MultiLvleFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method SQL_Worker_WorkerGetAll_ReturnsAllWorkers
has 158 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Worker_WorkerGetAll_ReturnsAllWorkers()
{
// Arrance
#region Arrance