Showing 3,203 of 3,219 total issues
Method SQL_Site_SimpleSiteGetAll_DoesReturnSiteList
has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Site_SimpleSiteGetAll_DoesReturnSiteList()
{
Method Answer_update_DoesUpdate
has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Answer_update_DoesUpdate()
{
Random rnd = new Random();
Method TemplateUploadData
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async Task<MainElement> TemplateUploadData(MainElement mainElement)
{
if (mainElement == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(mainElement), "mainElement not allowed to be null");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Core_eForm_SimpleFieldGroupsFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimpleFieldGroupsFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Up
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected override void Up(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
{
//Setup for SQL Server Provider
string autoIDGenStrategy = "SqlServer:ValueGenerationStrategy";
Method QuestionTranslation_Update_DoesUpdate_W_MicrotingUID_RemovesUid
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task QuestionTranslation_Update_DoesUpdate_W_MicrotingUID_RemovesUid()
{
Random rnd = new Random();
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
columns: table => new
{
Id = table.Column<int>(type: "int", nullable: false)
.Annotation("MySql:ValueGenerationStrategy", MySqlValueGenerationStrategy.IdentityColumn),
CheckListId = table.Column<int>(type: "int", nullable: true),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 293.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
columns: table => new
{
Id = table.Column<int>(type: "int", nullable: false)
.Annotation("MySql:ValueGenerationStrategy", MySqlValueGenerationStrategy.IdentityColumn),
CheckListId = table.Column<int>(type: "int", nullable: false),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 293.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method SQL_Check_FieldValueReadWithUploadedData_ReturnsAnswer
has 109 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Check_FieldValueReadWithUploadedData_ReturnsAnswer()
{
// Arrance
Method SQL_Site_SiteReadSimple_ReadsSite
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Site_SiteReadSimple_ReadsSite()
{
// Arrance
Method QuestionTranslation_Update_DoesUpdate_WO_MicrotingUID_AddsUID
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task QuestionTranslation_Update_DoesUpdate_WO_MicrotingUID_AddsUID()
{
Random rnd = new Random();
Method QuestionTranslation_Update_DoesUpdate_W_MicrotingUID
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task QuestionTranslation_Update_DoesUpdate_W_MicrotingUID()
{
Random rnd = new Random();
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
modelBuilder.Entity("Microting.eForm.Infrastructure.Data.Entities.survey_configurations", b =>
{
b.Property<int>("Id")
.ValueGeneratedOnAdd()
.HasAnnotation(autoIDGenStrategy, autoIDGenStrategyValue);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 287.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
modelBuilder.Entity("Microting.eForm.Infrastructure.Data.Entities.survey_configurations", b =>
{
b.Property<int>("Id")
.ValueGeneratedOnAdd()
.HasAnnotation(autoIDGenStrategy, autoIDGenStrategyValue);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 287.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
modelBuilder.Entity("Microting.eForm.Infrastructure.Data.Entities.survey_configurations", b =>
{
b.Property<int>("Id")
.ValueGeneratedOnAdd()
.HasAnnotation(autoIDGenStrategy, autoIDGenStrategyValue);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 287.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_EntitySearchItemCreateExistingRemovedItem_ChangesWorkflowStateToCreated()
{
// Arrance
EntityGroup eG1 = await testHelpers.CreateEntityGroup("microtingUIdC1", "EntityGroup1",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 287.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_EntitySelectItemCreateExistingRemovedItem_ChangesWorkflowStateToCreated()
{
// Arrance
EntityGroup eG1 = await testHelpers.CreateEntityGroup("microtingUIdC1", "EntityGroup1",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 287.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method SQL_PostCase_CaseFindCustomMatchs
has 107 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_PostCase_CaseFindCustomMatchs()
{
// Arrance
Method SQL_Site_SiteUpdate_UpdatesSite
has 107 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Site_SiteUpdate_UpdatesSite()
{
// Arrance
Method SQL_Site_SiteDelete_DeletesSite
has 107 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Site_SiteDelete_DeletesSite()
{
// Arrance