Showing 3,203 of 3,219 total issues
Method ClearDb
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task ClearDb()
{
List<string> modelNames = new List<string>
{
"CaseVersions",
Method ClearDb
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task ClearDb()
{
List<string> modelNames = new List<string>
{
"CaseVersions",
Method ClearDb
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task ClearDb()
{
List<string> modelNames = new List<string>
{
"CaseVersions",
Method ClearDb
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task ClearDb()
{
List<string> modelNames = new List<string>
{
"CaseVersions",
Method ClearDb
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task ClearDb()
{
List<string> modelNames = new List<string>
{
"CaseVersions",
Method ClearDb
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task ClearDb()
{
List<string> modelNames = new List<string>
{
"CaseVersions",
Method Core_Case_CaseIdLookUp_returnsId
has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_Case_CaseIdLookUp_returnsId()
{
// Arrange
Method Answers_Create_DoesCreate
has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Answers_Create_DoesCreate()
{
//Arrange
Random rnd = new Random();
Method SQL_Check_FieldValueReadList_ReturnsList
has 92 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_Check_FieldValueReadList_ReturnsList()
{
// Arrance
Class CoreTestCase
has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[TestFixture]
public class CoreTestCase : DbTestFixture
{
private Core sut;
private TestHelpers testHelpers;
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
switch (workflowState)
{
case Constants.Constants.WorkflowStates.NotRetracted:
subQuery = subQuery.Where(x => x.WorkflowState != Constants.Constants.WorkflowStates.Retracted);
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 248.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
switch (workflowState)
{
case Constants.Constants.WorkflowStates.NotRetracted:
subQuery = subQuery.Where(x => x.WorkflowState != Constants.Constants.WorkflowStates.Retracted);
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 248.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method CreateField
has 29 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async Task<Field> CreateField(short? barcodeEnabled, string barcodeType, CheckList checkList,
string color, string custom, int? decimalCount, string defaultValue, string description, int? displayIndex,
short? dummy, FieldType ft, short? geolocationEnabled, short? geolocationForced, short? geolocationHidden,
short? isNum, string label, short? mandatory, int maxLength, string maxValue, string minValue, short? multi,
short? optional, string queryType, short? readOnly, short? selected, short? split, short? stopOnSave,
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public override async Task DoSetup()
{
#region Setup SettingsTableContent
DbContextHelper dbContextHelper = new DbContextHelper(ConnectionString);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 247.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public override async Task DoSetup()
{
#region Setup SettingsTableContent
DbContextHelper dbContextHelper = new DbContextHelper(ConnectionString);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 247.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public override async Task DoSetup()
{
#region Setup SettingsTableContent
#region Setup SettingsTableContent
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 247.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public override async Task DoSetup()
{
#region Setup SettingsTableContent
DbContextHelper dbContextHelper = new DbContextHelper(ConnectionString);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 247.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method Core_Folders_UpdateFolder_DoesUpdateFolderWithTranslations
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_Folders_UpdateFolder_DoesUpdateFolderWithTranslations()
{
// Arrange
Method ClearDb
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task ClearDb()
{
Console.WriteLine($"Starting ClearDb {DateTime.Now.ToString(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)}");
List<string> modelNames = new List<string>();
Method AddDefaultLanguages
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static async Task AddDefaultLanguages(MicrotingDbContext dbContext)
{
if (dbContext.Languages.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == "Danish") != null)
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"