Showing 3,203 of 3,219 total issues
Method Units_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Units_Delete_DoesSetWorkflowStateToRemoved()
{
//Arrange
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public Task<bool> EntitySearchItemUpdate(string entitySearchGroupId, string entitySearchItemId, string name,
string description, string id)
{
_log.LogEverything("Communicator.EntitySearchItemUpdate", "called");
_log.LogVariable("Communicator.EntitySearchItemUpdate", nameof(entitySearchGroupId), entitySearchGroupId);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 197.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public Task<bool> EntitySelectItemUpdate(string entitySearchGroupId, string entitySearchItemId, string name,
int displayOrder, string ownUUID)
{
_log.LogEverything("Communicator.EntitySelectItemUpdate", "called");
_log.LogVariable("Communicator.EntitySelectItemUpdate", nameof(entitySearchGroupId), entitySearchGroupId);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 197.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public class SingleSelect : DataItem
{
internal SingleSelect()
{
KeyValuePairList = new List<KeyValuePair>();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 196.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public class MultiSelect : DataItem
{
internal MultiSelect()
{
KeyValuePairList = new List<KeyValuePair>();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 196.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method Core_eForm_SimplePictureFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eForm_SimplePictureFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
// Arrange
string xmlstring = @"
Method Core_eFormSimpleTextSingleLineFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Text
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTextSingleLineFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method SettingCheckAll
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async Task<List<string>> SettingCheckAll()
{
string methodName = "SqlController.SettingCheckAll";
List<string> result = new List<string>();
try
Method EformCreateDb
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task<int> EformCreateDb(MainElement mainElement)
{
string methodName = "SqlController.EformCreateDb";
try
{
Method AddImageToBody
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void AddImageToBody(WordprocessingDocument wordDoc, string relationshipId, Int64Value cx,
Int64Value cy, Paragraph paragraph = null)
{
WriteDebugConsoleLogEntry(new LogEntry(2, "ReportHelper", "AddImageToBody called"));
// Define the reference of the image.
Method JasperToPdf
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task<string> JasperToPdf(int caseId, string jasperTemplate, string timeStamp)
{
string methodName = "Core.JasperToPdf";
// run jar
// Start the child process.
Method ReplaceDataElementsAndDataItems
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private async Task<List<Element>> ReplaceDataElementsAndDataItems(int caseId, List<Element> elementList,
List<FieldValue> lstAnswers)
{
List<Element> elementListReplaced = new List<Element>();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method GetQuestionSet
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public async Task<bool> GetQuestionSet(int microtingUid, int questionSetId, int threadNumber)
{
var jsonSerializerSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings
{
NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (field.FieldType == "SingleSelect")
{
var singleSelectFieldOptions =
await db.FieldOptions.AsNoTracking().Where(x => x.FieldId == field.Id)
.Join(db.FieldOptionTranslations,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 194.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (field.FieldType == "MultiSelect")
{
var multiSelectFieldOptions =
await db.FieldOptions.AsNoTracking().Where(x => x.FieldId == field.Id)
.Join(db.FieldOptionTranslations,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 194.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method SQL_PostCase_CaseReadFull
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task SQL_PostCase_CaseReadFull()
{
// Arrance
Method Core_eFormSimpleSaveButtonFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleSaveButtonFormCreateInDB_ReturnseFormId()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Core_eFormSimpleTextMultiLineFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test] // Comment
public async Task Core_eFormSimpleTextMultiLineFormFromXML_ReturnseMainElement()
{
string xmlstring = @"
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
Method Down
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected override void Down(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
{
migrationBuilder.AlterColumn<string>(
name: "MicrotingUid",
table: "notifications",
Method Up
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected override void Up(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
{
migrationBuilder.AddColumn<int>(
name: "MicrotingUid",
table: "survey_configurations",