Showing 246 of 246 total issues
File jquery.js
has 6474 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.7.2
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Copyright 2011, John Resig
Function jQuery
has 614 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var jQuery = (function() {
// Define a local copy of jQuery
var jQuery = function( selector, context ) {
// The jQuery object is actually just the init constructor 'enhanced'
File chosen.js
has 847 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Chosen, a Select Box Enhancer for jQuery and Protoype
// by Patrick Filler for Harvest, http://getharvest.com
//
// Version 0.9.8
// Full source at https://github.com/harvesthq/chosen
File backbone.js
has 785 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Backbone.js 0.9.1
// (c) 2010-2012 Jeremy Ashkenas, DocumentCloud Inc.
// Backbone may be freely distributed under the MIT license.
// For all details and documentation:
File underscore.js
has 665 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Underscore.js 1.3.1
// (c) 2009-2012 Jeremy Ashkenas, DocumentCloud Inc.
// Underscore is freely distributable under the MIT license.
// Portions of Underscore are inspired or borrowed from Prototype,
// Oliver Steele's Functional, and John Resig's Micro-Templating.
Function ajax
has 242 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
File jquery.effects.core.js
has 544 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* jQuery UI Effects @VERSION
*
* Copyright 2011, AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about)
* Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses.
Function mask
has 184 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
mask: function(mask, settings) {
if (!mask && this.length > 0) {
var input = $(this[0]);
return input.data($.mask.dataName)();
}
Function support
has 172 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.support = (function() {
var support,
all,
a,
Function Callbacks
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.Callbacks = function( flags ) {
// Convert flags from String-formatted to Object-formatted
// (we check in cache first)
flags = flags ? ( flagsCache[ flags ] || createFlags( flags ) ) : {};
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && original.clientX != null ) {
eventDoc = event.target.ownerDocument || document;
doc = eventDoc.documentElement;
body = eventDoc.body;
Function Sizzle
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Sizzle = function( selector, context, results, seed ) {
results = results || [];
context = context || document;
var origContext = context;
Function clean
has 95 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clean: function( elems, context, fragment, scripts ) {
var checkScriptType, script, j,
ret = [];
context = context || document;
Function trigger
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
// Don't do events on text and comment nodes
if ( elem && (elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8) ) {
return;
}
Function animate
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
animate: function( prop, speed, easing, callback ) {
var optall = jQuery.speed( speed, easing, callback );
if ( jQuery.isEmptyObject( prop ) ) {
return this.each( optall.complete, [ false ] );
Function send
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function( headers, complete ) {
// Get a new xhr
var xhr = s.xhr(),
handle,
Function doAnimation
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function doAnimation() {
// XXX 'this' does not always have a nodeName when running the
// test suite
if ( optall.queue === false ) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"~": function( checkSet, part, isXML ) {
var nodeCheck,
doneName = done++,
checkFn = dirCheck;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"": function(checkSet, part, isXML){
var nodeCheck,
doneName = done++,
checkFn = dirCheck;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function Deferred
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Deferred: function( func ) {
var doneList = jQuery.Callbacks( "once memory" ),
failList = jQuery.Callbacks( "once memory" ),
progressList = jQuery.Callbacks( "memory" ),
state = "pending",