Showing 12 of 19 total issues
Function computeOrientationProperties
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const computeOrientationProperties = (legsNoGravity, flags = { shuffle: false }) => {
const someLegTrios = flags.shuffle
? shuffleArray(SOME_LEG_ID_TRIOS.slice())
: SOME_LEG_ID_TRIOS
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function solve
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
solve(legDimensions, bodyContactPoints, groundContactPoints, axes) {
// prettier-ignore
this.params = {
bodyContactPoints, groundContactPoints, axes, legDimensions
}
Function constructor
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor(
dimensions,
pose,
flags = { hasNoPoints: false, assumeKnownGroundPoints: false, wontRotate: false }
) {
Function solve
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
solve(legDimensions, bodyContactPoints, groundContactPoints, axes) {
// prettier-ignore
this.params = {
bodyContactPoints, groundContactPoints, axes, legDimensions
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
toggleGaitType = () => {
const { gaitParams, inWalkMode } = this.state
const isTripodGait = !this.state.isTripodGait
this.setWalkSequence(gaitParams, isTripodGait, inWalkMode)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
toggleWalkMode = () => {
const { gaitParams, isTripodGait } = this.state
const inWalkMode = !this.state.inWalkMode
this.setWalkSequence(gaitParams, isTripodGait, inWalkMode)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function findTwoPivotPoints
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const findTwoPivotPoints = (currentPoints, targetPoints, excludedPositions) => {
const targetPointsMap = targetPoints.reduce((acc, point) => {
acc[point.name] = point
return acc
}, {})
Function handleChange
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
handleChange(value) {
const { minVal, maxVal, stepVal } = this.props.rangeParams
const validity = this.myRef.current.validity
if (validity.badInput) {
Function simpleTwist
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const simpleTwist = groundLegsNoGravity => {
const firstLeg = groundLegsNoGravity[0]
const allSameAlpha = groundLegsNoGravity.every(
leg => leg.pose.alpha === firstLeg.pose.alpha
Function findTwoPivotPoints
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const findTwoPivotPoints = (currentPoints, targetPoints, excludedPositions) => {
const targetPointsMap = targetPoints.reduce((acc, point) => {
acc[point.name] = point
return acc
}, {})
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mightTwist
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const mightTwist = legsOnGround => {
let negativeAlphaCount = 0
let positiveAlphaCount = 0
for (let i = 0; i < legsOnGround.length; i++) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function constructor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor(
dimensions,
pose,
flags = { hasNoPoints: false, assumeKnownGroundPoints: false, wontRotate: false }
) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"