Sign upLogin

moertel/sQucumber-redshift

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 8 of 8 total issues

Method values_match has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def values_match(actual, expected)
    if expected.eql?('today')
      actual.match(/#{Regexp.quote(Date.today.to_s)}/)
    elsif expected.eql?('yesterday')
      actual.match(/#{Regexp.quote((Date.today - 1).to_s)}/)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/squcumber-redshift/support/matchers.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method install_tasks has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def install_tasks
          namespace :test do
            # Auto-generate Rake tasks for each feature and each of their parent directories
            @features_dir = File.join(FileUtils.pwd, 'features')
            features = Dir.glob("#{@features_dir}/**/*.feature")
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/squcumber-redshift/rake/task.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method destroy has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            def destroy
          @testing_database.close()

          if DELETE_DB_WHEN_FINISHED
            attempts = 0
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/squcumber-redshift/mock/database.rb - About 55 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method insert_mock_values has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            def insert_mock_values(schema_and_table, mock)
          schema, table = schema_and_table.split('.')
          keys = []
          vals = []
          mock.each do |key, value|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/squcumber-redshift/mock/database.rb - About 55 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method format_error has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def format_error(expected_data, actual_result)
    expectation_count = (expected_data.rows.count rescue nil) || 0
    if expectation_count == 0
      table_headings = actual_result[0].keys
    else
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/squcumber-redshift/support/output.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    Then(/^the result includes.*$/) do |data|
  actual = @result || []
  expected = data.hashes || []

  expected.each do |hash|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/squcumber-redshift/step_definitions/common_steps.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
    lib/squcumber-redshift/step_definitions/common_steps.rb on lines 124..131

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 38.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    Then(/^the result does not include.*$/) do |data|
  actual = @result || []
  expected = data.hashes || []

  expected.each do |hash|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/squcumber-redshift/step_definitions/common_steps.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
    lib/squcumber-redshift/step_definitions/common_steps.rb on lines 111..118

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 38.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Method install_tasks has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            def install_tasks
          namespace :test do
            # Auto-generate Rake tasks for each feature and each of their parent directories
            @features_dir = File.join(FileUtils.pwd, 'features')
            features = Dir.glob("#{@features_dir}/**/*.feature")
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/squcumber-redshift/rake/task.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language