Showing 19 of 19 total issues
File trackable.rb
has 386 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Mongoid
module History
module Trackable
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
Method get_versions_criteria
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_versions_criteria(options_or_version)
if options_or_version.is_a? Hash
options = options_or_version
if options[:from] && options[:to]
lower = options[:from] >= options[:to] ? options[:to] : options[:from]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method related_scope
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def related_scope
scope = history_trackable_options[:scope]
# Use top level document if its name is specified in the scope
root_document_name = traverse_association_chain.first['name'].singularize.underscore.tr('/', '_').to_sym
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tracked_edits
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tracked_edits
return @tracked_edits if @tracked_edits
@tracked_edits = HashWithIndifferentAccess.new
tracked_changes.each do |k, v|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method prepare_formatted_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def prepare_formatted_fields
formats = {}
if @prepared[:format].class == Hash
@prepared[:format].each do |field, format|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method traverse_association_chain
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def traverse_association_chain
chain = association_chain.dup
doc = nil
documents = []
loop do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method track_history
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def track_history(options = {})
extend RelationMethods
history_options = Mongoid::History::Options.new(self, options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method changes_from_parent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def changes_from_parent
track_blank_changes = trackable_class.history_trackable_options[:track_blank_changes]
parent_changes = {}
changes.each do |k, v|
change_value = begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def attributes
@attributes = {}
trackable.attributes.each do |k, v|
next unless trackable_class.tracked_field?(k, :create)
modified = if changes[k]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method association_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def association_hash(node = self)
# We prefer to look up associations through the parent record because
# we're assured, through the object creation, it'll exist. Whereas we're not guaranteed
# the child to parent (embedded_in, belongs_to) relation will be defined
if node._parent
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
scope = _association.inverse_class_name.tableize.singularize.to_sym if _association.present? && scope == _association.as
Method parse_tracked_fields_and_relations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_tracked_fields_and_relations
# case `options[:on]`
# when `posts: [:id, :title]`, then it will convert it to `[[:posts, [:id, :title]]]`
# when `:foo`, then `[:foo]`
# when `[:foo, { posts: [:id, :title] }]`, then return as is
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method track_history_for_action
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def track_history_for_action(action)
if track_history_for_action?(action)
current_version = increment_current_version?(action) ? increment_current_version : next_version
last_track = self.class.tracker_class.create!(
history_tracker_attributes(action.to_sym)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def undo!(modifier = nil)
if action.to_sym == :destroy
re_create
elsif action.to_sym == :create
re_destroy
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def redo!(modifier = nil)
if action.to_sym == :destroy
re_destroy
elsif action.to_sym == :create
re_create
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method transform_changes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def transform_changes(changes)
original = {}
modified = {}
changes.each_pair do |k, modification_pair|
o, m = modification_pair
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method format_relation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format_relation(relation_class, obj, permitted_attrs, formats)
obj.inject({}) do |m, field_value|
field = relation_class.database_field_name(field_value.first)
next m unless permitted_attrs.include?(field)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method categorize_tracked_option
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def categorize_tracked_option(field, field_options = nil)
return if @prepared[:except].include?(field)
return if reserved_fields.include?(field)
field_options = Array(field_options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method insert_embeds_one_changes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def insert_embeds_one_changes
trackable_class.tracked_embeds_one.each do |rel|
rel_class = trackable_class.relation_class_of(rel)
paranoia_field = Mongoid::History.trackable_class_settings(rel_class)[:paranoia_field]
paranoia_field = rel_class.aliased_fields.key(paranoia_field) || paranoia_field
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"