Sign upLogin

moser/foxtrot_mike

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 90 of 90 total issues

Method min_date has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def min_date(a, b)
    if a && b
      a < b ? a : b
    else
      nil
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/accounting_entry_invalidation.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method show has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def show
    @airfield = Airfield.find(params[:airfield_id])
    authorize! :read, @airfield
    @date = parse_date(params[:filter], :date) || AbstractFlight.latest_departure(@airfield.flights).to_date
    if params[:as] == 'controller_log'
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/main_log_books_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_mtimes_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def build_mtimes_hash(globs, first)
  files = @files || {}
  globs.each { |g|
    Dir[g].each { |file| files[file] = first ? File.mtime(file) : (files[file] || (Time.now - 86400)) }
  }
Severity: Minor
Found in autospec.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def parent
    [ :flight, :accounting_entry, :accounting_session ].each do |o|
      return o.to_s.camelcase.constantize.find(params["#{o}_id"]) if params["#{o}_id"]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/destroy_confirmations_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/controllers/merges_controller.rb on lines 9..11

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def parent
    [ :person, :plane, :airfield ].each do |o|
      return o.to_s.camelcase.constantize.find(params["#{o}_id"]) if params["#{o}_id"]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/merges_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/controllers/destroy_confirmations_controller.rb on lines 29..31

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def merge_to(other_airfield)
    flights_from.each do |f|
      f.update_attribute :from, other_airfield
    end
    flights_to.each do |f|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/airfield.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/person.rb on lines 227..235

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def find_concerned_accounting_entry_owners(from = valid_from, to = valid_to, &blk)
    blk ||= lambda { |r| r }
    plane.find_concerned_accounting_entry_owners { |r| blk.call(r).between(min_date(valid_from, from), max_date(valid_to, to)) }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/plane_cost_category_membership.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/person_cost_category_membership.rb on lines 14..16
app/models/wire_launcher_cost_category_membership.rb on lines 14..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def find_concerned_accounting_entry_owners(from = valid_from, to = valid_to, &blk)
    blk ||= lambda { |r| r }
    wire_launcher.find_concerned_accounting_entry_owners { |r| blk.call(r).between(min_date(valid_from, from), max_date(valid_to, to)) }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/wire_launcher_cost_category_membership.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/person_cost_category_membership.rb on lines 14..16
app/models/plane_cost_category_membership.rb on lines 14..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def find_concerned_accounting_entry_owners(from = valid_from, to = valid_to, &blk)
    blk ||= lambda { |r| r }
    person.find_concerned_accounting_entry_owners { |r| blk.call(r).between(min_date(valid_from, from), max_date(valid_to, to)) }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/person_cost_category_membership.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/plane_cost_category_membership.rb on lines 14..16
app/models/wire_launcher_cost_category_membership.rb on lines 14..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def merge_to(other_person)
    flights_on_seat1.each do |f|
      f.update_attribute :seat1_person, other_person
    end
    flights_on_seat2.each do |f|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/person.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/airfield.rb on lines 53..61

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language