Showing 7,845 of 7,845 total issues
File lottie_canvas.module.js
has 13285 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const lottie = {};
if (typeof document !== 'undefined') {
const svgNS = 'http://www.w3.org/2000/svg';
File mmdparser.module.js
has 10746 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* @author Takahiro / https://github.com/takahirox
*
* Simple CharsetEncoder.
*/
File opentype.module.js
has 9607 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* https://opentype.js.org v1.3.4 | (c) Frederik De Bleser and other contributors | MIT License | Uses tiny-inflate by Devon Govett and string.prototype.codepointat polyfill by Mathias Bynens
*/
/*! https://mths.be/codepointat v0.2.0 by @mathias */
File codemirror.js
has 7857 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// CodeMirror, copyright (c) by Marijn Haverbeke and others
// Distributed under an MIT license: https://codemirror.net/LICENSE
// This is CodeMirror (https://codemirror.net), a code editor
// implemented in JavaScript on top of the browser's DOM.
Function WebGLTextures
has a Cognitive Complexity of 1059 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function WebGLTextures( _gl, extensions, state, properties, capabilities, utils, info ) {
const multisampledRTTExt = extensions.has( 'WEBGL_multisampled_render_to_texture' ) ? extensions.get( 'WEBGL_multisampled_render_to_texture' ) : null;
const supportsInvalidateFramebuffer = typeof navigator === 'undefined' ? false : /OculusBrowser/g.test( navigator.userAgent );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 1002 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse( text, path ) {
function getElementsByTagName( xml, name ) {
// Non recursive xml.getElementsByTagName() ...
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File esprima.js
has 6001 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function webpackUniversalModuleDefinition(root, factory) {
/* istanbul ignore next */
if(typeof exports === 'object' && typeof module === 'object')
module.exports = factory();
else if(typeof define === 'function' && define.amd)
Function parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 721 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse( data, path ) {
const nodeMap = {};
function generateVRMLTree( data ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File threejs.js
has 5030 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function(mod) {
if (typeof exports == "object" && typeof module == "object") // CommonJS
return mod(require("tern/lib/infer"), require("tern/lib/tern"));
if (typeof define == "function" && define.amd) // AMD
return define([ "tern/lib/infer", "tern/lib/tern" ], mod);
Function dataManager
has a Cognitive Complexity of 697 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const dataManager = (function () {
var _counterId = 1;
var processes = [];
var workerFn;
var workerInstance;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Parser
has 2764 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Parser = (function () {
function Parser(code, options, delegate) {
if (options === void 0) { options = {}; }
this.config = {
range: (typeof options.range === 'boolean') && options.range,
Function parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 584 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse( buffer ) {
const USHORT_RANGE = ( 1 << 16 );
const BITMAP_SIZE = ( USHORT_RANGE >> 3 );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parse
has 2294 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse( text, path ) {
function getElementsByTagName( xml, name ) {
// Non recursive xml.getElementsByTagName() ...
Function getMeasures
has a Cognitive Complexity of 551 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TextAnimatorProperty.prototype.getMeasures = function (documentData, lettersChangedFlag) {
this.lettersChangedFlag = lettersChangedFlag;
if (!this._mdf && !this._isFirstFrame && !lettersChangedFlag && (!this._hasMaskedPath || !this._pathData.m._mdf)) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function constructor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 550 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor( parameters = {} ) {
const {
canvas = createCanvasElement(),
context = null,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 541 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse( text ) {
const scope = this;
function parseNode( node, style ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 481 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse( data ) {
function parseASCII( data ) {
// connectivity of the triangles
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
ja: {
'menubar/file': 'ファイル',
'menubar/file/new': '新規',
'menubar/file/import': 'インポート',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1541.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
fr: {
'menubar/file': 'Fichier',
'menubar/file/new': 'Nouveau',
'menubar/file/import': 'Importer',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1541.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
zh: {
'menubar/file': '文件',
'menubar/file/new': '新建',
'menubar/file/import': '导入',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1541.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76