Sign upLogin

mrkamel/attr_searchable

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 10 of 10 total issues

Method parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def parse(value)
        return value..value unless value.is_a?(::String)

        if value =~ /^[0-9]+ (hour|day|week|month|year)s{0,1} (ago)$/
          number, period, ago = value.split(" ")
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/search_cop_grammar/attributes.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def parse(value)
        return value..value unless value.is_a?(::String)

        if value =~ /^[0-9]+ (day|week|month|year)s{0,1} (ago)$/
          number, period, ago = value.split(" ")
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/search_cop_grammar/attributes.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method unsafe_search_cop has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def unsafe_search_cop(query, scope_name, query_options)
      return respond_to?(:scoped) ? scoped : all if query.blank?

      query_builder = QueryBuilder.new(self, query, search_scopes[scope_name], query_options)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/search_cop.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method parse_attribute has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def parse_attribute(key, value)
    collection = SearchCopGrammar::Attributes::Collection.new(query_info, key.to_s)

    if value.is_a?(Hash)
      raise(SearchCop::ParseError, "Unknown operator #{value.keys.first}") unless collection.valid_operator?(value.keys.first)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/search_cop/hash_parser.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def initialize(klass, table_alias, column_name, field_names, options = {})
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/search_cop_grammar/attributes.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Method matches_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def matches_value(value)
        res = value.gsub(/[%_\\]/) { |char| "\\#{char}" }

        if value.strip =~ /^\*|\*$/
          res = res.gsub(/^\*/, "%") if options[:left_wildcard] != false
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/search_cop_grammar/attributes.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def visit_SearchCopGrammar_Attributes_Json(attribute)
        elements = ["#{quote_table_name attribute.table_alias}.#{quote_column_name attribute.column_name}", *attribute.field_names.map { |field_name| quote(field_name) }]

        "#{elements[0...-1].join("->")}->>#{elements.last}"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/search_cop/visitors/postgres.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
    lib/search_cop/visitors/postgres.rb on lines 12..15

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 33.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def visit_SearchCopGrammar_Attributes_Jsonb(attribute)
        elements = ["#{quote_table_name attribute.table_alias}.#{quote_column_name attribute.column_name}", *attribute.field_names.map { |field_name| quote(field_name) }]

        "#{elements[0...-1].join("->")}->>#{elements.last}"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/search_cop/visitors/postgres.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
    lib/search_cop/visitors/postgres.rb on lines 6..9

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 33.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

              ::Date.new(Regexp.last_match(3).to_i, Regexp.last_match(1).to_i, 15).beginning_of_month..::Date.new(Regexp.last_match(3).to_i, Regexp.last_match(1).to_i, 15).end_of_month
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/search_cop_grammar/attributes.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
    lib/search_cop_grammar/attributes.rb on lines 276..276

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 25.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

              ::Date.new(Regexp.last_match(1).to_i, Regexp.last_match(3).to_i, 15).beginning_of_month..::Date.new(Regexp.last_match(1).to_i, Regexp.last_match(3).to_i, 15).end_of_month
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/search_cop_grammar/attributes.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
    lib/search_cop_grammar/attributes.rb on lines 278..278

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 25.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language