Showing 1,335 of 1,335 total issues
Method has too many lines. [16/10] Open
def parse_font_family(format)
font = format[:font_family].to_s.split.last
valid_values = [:none, :roman, :swiss, :modern, :script, :decorative]
if valid_values.include?(font)
font
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Line is too long. [144/120] Open
# @return [Boolean, NilClass] returns nil if it doesn't belong to a table, false when it isn't the first row of a table and true when it is.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks the length of lines in the source code.
The maximum length is configurable.
The tab size is configured in the IndentationWidth
of the Layout/IndentationStyle
cop.
It also ignores a shebang line by default.
This cop has some autocorrection capabilities. It can programmatically shorten certain long lines by inserting line breaks into expressions that can be safely split across lines. These include arrays, hashes, and method calls with argument lists.
If autocorrection is enabled, the following Layout cops are recommended to further format the broken lines. (Many of these are enabled by default.)
- ArgumentAlignment
- BlockAlignment
- BlockDelimiters
- BlockEndNewline
- ClosingParenthesisIndentation
- FirstArgumentIndentation
- FirstArrayElementIndentation
- FirstHashElementIndentation
- FirstParameterIndentation
- HashAlignment
- IndentationWidth
- MultilineArrayLineBreaks
- MultilineBlockLayout
- MultilineHashBraceLayout
- MultilineHashKeyLineBreaks
- MultilineMethodArgumentLineBreaks
- ParameterAlignment
Together, these cops will pretty print hashes, arrays, method calls, etc. For example, let's say the max columns is 25:
Example:
# bad
{foo: "0000000000", bar: "0000000000", baz: "0000000000"}
# good
{foo: "0000000000",
bar: "0000000000", baz: "0000000000"}
# good (with recommended cops enabled)
{
foo: "0000000000",
bar: "0000000000",
baz: "0000000000",
}
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def column_type
return @column_type if defined?(@column_type)
ind = index
table[1..500].each do |row|
if row[ind]&.cell_type
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Method parse_xlsx_cell
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_xlsx_cell cell
type = cell.attr("t")
format_index = cell.attr("s").to_i
position = cell.attr("r")
formula = cell.css("f").text
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def parse_ods_style parse_ods_style
parse_ods_style.xpath("//style:style").each do |style|
style_family = style.xpath("@style:family").to_s
if style_family == "table-cell"
format = Workbook::Format.new
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def load_ods file_obj, options = {}
file_obj = file_obj.path if file_obj.is_a? File
content = ""
styles = ""
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def trim!(desired_length = nil)
self_count = count - 1
count.times do |index|
index = self_count - index
if desired_length && (index < desired_length)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def [](index_or_hash)
if index_or_hash.is_a? Symbol
rv = nil
begin
rv = to_hash[index_or_hash]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def align other, options = {}
options = {sort: true, ignore_headers: false}.merge(options)
sother = other.clone.remove_empty_lines!
sself = clone.remove_empty_lines!
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Cyclomatic complexity for string_optimistic_date_converter is too high. [11/7] Open
def string_optimistic_date_converter
proc do |v|
if v
rv = v
starts_with_nr = v[0].to_i.to_s == v[0] # it should at least start with a number...
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Cyclomatic complexity for format_to_xls_format is too high. [11/7] Open
def format_to_xls_format f
unless f.is_a? Workbook::Format
f = Workbook::Format.new f
end
xlsfmt = f.return_raw_for Spreadsheet::Format
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Method to_xls
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xls options = {}
book = init_spreadsheet_template
each_with_index do |s, si|
xls_sheet = xls_sheet(si)
xls_sheet.name = s.name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_xlsx
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xlsx options = {}
formats_to_xlsx_format
book = init_xlsx_spreadsheet_template.workbook
book.worksheets.pop(book.worksheets.count - count) if book.worksheets && (book.worksheets.count > count)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Perceived complexity for align_row is too high. [11/8] Open
def align_row sself, sother, row_index
asd = 0
if sself.rows[row_index] && sother.rows[row_index]
asd = sself.rows[row_index].key <=> sother.rows[row_index].key
elsif sself.rows[row_index]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Perceived complexity for string_optimistic_date_converter is too high. [11/8] Open
def string_optimistic_date_converter
proc do |v|
if v
rv = v
starts_with_nr = v[0].to_i.to_s == v[0] # it should at least start with a number...
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method has too many lines. [13/10] Open
def new_diff_template
diffbook = Workbook::Book.new
template = diffbook.template
f = template.create_or_find_format_by "destroyed"
f[:background_color] = :red
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Method has too many lines. [13/10] Open
def num_fmt_id_to_ms_formatting num_fmt_id
# from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4730152/what-indicates-an-office-open-xml-cell-contains-a-date-time-value
{"0" => nil, "1" => "0", "2" => "0.00", "3" => "#,##0", "4" => "#,##0.00",
"9" => "0%", "10" => "0.00%", "11" => "0.00E+00", "12" => "# ?/?",
"13" => "# ??/??", "14" => "mm-dd-yy", "15" => "d-mmm-yy", "16" => "d-mmm",
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set literals you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', and 'heredoc'. Each literal
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use IgnoredMethods
instead.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
end # 5 points
Cyclomatic complexity for format_to_xlsx_format is too high. [10/7] Open
def format_to_xlsx_format f
f = make_sure_f_is_a_workbook_format f
xlsfmt = {}
xlsfmt[:fg_color] = "FF#{f[:color].to_s.upcase}".delete("#") if f[:color]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Cyclomatic complexity for to_xls is too high. [10/7] Open
def to_xls options = {}
book = init_spreadsheet_template
each_with_index do |s, si|
xls_sheet = xls_sheet(si)
xls_sheet.name = s.name
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Perceived complexity for format_to_xls_format is too high. [11/8] Open
def format_to_xls_format f
unless f.is_a? Workbook::Format
f = Workbook::Format.new f
end
xlsfmt = f.return_raw_for Spreadsheet::Format
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points