Showing 12 of 12 total issues
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(xml, options = {})
# Capture any provided namespaces and merge in any namespaces that have
# been registered on the object.
namespaces = options[:namespaces] || {}
namespaces = namespaces.merge(@registered_namespaces)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_nodes_to_parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_nodes_to_parse(options, namespace, tag_name, namespaces, node, root)
# when at the root use the xpath '/' otherwise use a more gready './/'
# unless an xpath has been specified, which should overwrite default
# and finally attach the current namespace if one has been defined
#
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(xml, options = {})
# Capture any provided namespaces and merge in any namespaces that have
# been registered on the object.
namespaces = options[:namespaces] || {}
namespaces = namespaces.merge(@registered_namespaces)
Method element_to_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def element_to_xml(element, xml, default_namespace)
#
# If an element is marked as read only do not consider at all when
# saving to XML.
#
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collect_writable_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_writable_attributes
#
# Find the attributes for the class and collect them into an array
# that will be placed into a Hash structure
#
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method define_element_on_class
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def define_element_on_class(klass, node)
# When a text node has been provided create the necessary
# HappyMapper content attribute if the text happens to contain
# some content.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_attributes_option
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_attributes_option(result, value, xpath_options)
return unless options[:attributes].is_a?(Hash)
result = result.first unless result.respond_to?(:attribute_nodes)
return unless result.respond_to?(:attribute_nodes)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find(node, namespace, xpath_options)
if self.namespace
# from the class definition
namespace = self.namespace
elsif options[:namespace]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method element_to_xml
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def element_to_xml(element, xml, default_namespace)
#
# If an element is marked as read only do not consider at all when
# saving to XML.
#
Method to_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xml(builder = nil, default_namespace = nil, namespace_override = nil,
tag_from_parent = nil)
#
# If to_xml has been called without a passed in builder instance that
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_nodes_to_parse
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_nodes_to_parse(options, namespace, tag_name, namespaces, node, root)
Method parse_node
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_node(node, options, namespace, namespaces)
# If an existing HappyMapper object is provided, update it with the
# values from the xml being parsed. Otherwise, create a new object
obj = options[:update] || new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"