File utils.py
has 336 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from collections import namedtuple
from operator import itemgetter
from os.path import basename, join, splitext
import datetime as dt
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function learn_from_result. (14) Open
def learn_from_result(result, node):
if not result['data']:
return
capture_columns = set(
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function create_query_pack_from_upload. (14) Open
def create_query_pack_from_upload(upload):
'''
Create a pack and queries from a query pack file. **Note**, if a
pack already exists under the filename being uploaded, then any
queries defined here will be added to the existing pack! However,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function extract_results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_results(result):
"""
extract_results will convert the incoming log data into a series of Fields,
normalizing and/or aggregating both batch and event format into batch
format, which is used throughout the rest of doorman.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_query_pack_from_upload
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_query_pack_from_upload(upload):
'''
Create a pack and queries from a query pack file. **Note**, if a
pack already exists under the filename being uploaded, then any
queries defined here will be added to the existing pack! However,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function learn_from_result
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def learn_from_result(result, node):
if not result['data']:
return
capture_columns = set(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_paginate_options
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_paginate_options(request, model, choices, existing_query=None,
Function quote
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def quote(s, quote='"'):
buf = [quote]
for ch in s:
if ch == quote or ch == '\\':
buf.append('\\')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if action == 'removed' and (cvalue is None or cvalue != value):
pass
elif action == 'removed' and cvalue == value:
node_info.pop(column)
elif action == 'added' and (cvalue is None or cvalue != value):
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
.options(db.contains_eager(Pack.queries)).all():
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Closing bracket does not match visual indentation Open
)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
def pretty_field(field):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
def pretty_operator(cond):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass