myfreecomm/cobrato-client-ruby

View on GitHub
lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
0 mins
Test Coverage

Cobrato::Resources::Base has at least 18 methods
Open

    class Base
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

Too Many Methods is a special case of LargeClass.

Example

Given this configuration

TooManyMethods:
  max_methods: 3

and this code:

class TooManyMethods
  def one; end
  def two; end
  def three; end
  def four; end
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [1]:TooManyMethods has at least 4 methods (TooManyMethods)

Cobrato::Resources::Base#respond_with_collection has approx 6 statements
Open

      def respond_with_collection(response, class_name=nil)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.

Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.

So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:

def parse(arg, argv, &error)
  if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
    return nil, block, nil                                         # +1
  end
  opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]                          # +2
  val = conv_arg(*val)                                             # +3
  if opt and !arg
    argv.shift                                                     # +4
  else
    val[0] = nil                                                   # +5
  end
  val                                                              # +6
end

(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)

Cobrato::Resources::Base has no descriptive comment
Open

    class Base
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

Classes and modules are the units of reuse and release. It is therefore considered good practice to annotate every class and module with a brief comment outlining its responsibilities.

Example

Given

class Dummy
  # Do things...
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [1]:Dummy has no descriptive comment (IrresponsibleModule)

Fixing this is simple - just an explaining comment:

# The Dummy class is responsible for ...
class Dummy
  # Do things...
end

Cobrato::Resources::Base#crud_request calls 'self.class' 2 times
Open

        if self.class.crud.include?(:all) || self.class.crud.include?(method.to_sym)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Cobrato::Resources::Base#crud_request calls 'self.class.crud' 2 times
Open

        if self.class.crud.include?(:all) || self.class.crud.include?(method.to_sym)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Cobrato::Resources::Base#http is a writable attribute
Open

      attr_accessor :http
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

A class that publishes a setter for an instance variable invites client classes to become too intimate with its inner workings, and in particular with its representation of state.

The same holds to a lesser extent for getters, but Reek doesn't flag those.

Example

Given:

class Klass
  attr_accessor :dummy
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

reek test.rb

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [2]:Klass declares the writable attribute dummy (Attribute)

Cobrato::Resources::Base#parsed_body doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?)
Open

      def parsed_body(response)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.

Cobrato::Resources::Base#respond_with_openstruct doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?)
Open

      def respond_with_openstruct(response)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.

Cobrato::Resources::Base#deprecate has the variable name 'a'
Open

        (params.keys.map(&:to_s) & deprecated).each do |a|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/cobrato/resources/base.rb by reek

An Uncommunicative Variable Name is a variable name that doesn't communicate its intent well enough.

Poor names make it hard for the reader to build a mental picture of what's going on in the code. They can also be mis-interpreted; and they hurt the flow of reading, because the reader must slow down to interpret the names.

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status