Method _process_ontologies
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _process_ontologies(success_keyword, error_keyword, process_proc)
response = { errors: '', success: '' }
if params['ontologies'].blank?
response[:errors] = "No ontologies parameter passed. Syntax: ?ontologies=ONT1,ONT2,...,ONTN"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class AdminController
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AdminController < ApplicationController
layout :determine_layout
before_action :cache_setup
DEBUG_BLACKLIST = [:"$,", :$ADDITIONAL_ONTOLOGY_DETAILS, :$rdebug_state, :$PROGRAM_NAME, :$LOADED_FEATURES, :$KCODE, :$-i, :$rails_rake_task, :$$, :$gems_build_rake_task, :$daemons_stop_proc, :$VERBOSE, :$DAEMONS_ARGV, :$daemons_sigterm, :$DEBUG_BEFORE, :$stdout, :$-0, :$-l, :$-I, :$DEBUG, :$', :$gems_rake_task, :$_, :$CODERAY_DEBUG, :$-F, :$", :$0, :$=, :$FILENAME, :$?, :$!, :$rdebug_in_irb, :$-K, :$TESTING, :$fileutils_rb_have_lchmod, :$EMAIL_EXCEPTIONS, :$binding, :$-v, :$>, :$SAFE, :$/, :$fileutils_rb_have_lchown, :$-p, :$-W, :$:, :$__dbg_interface, :$stderr, :$\, :$&, :$<, :$debug, :$;, :$~, :$-a, :$DEBUG_RDOC, :$CGI_ENV, :$LOAD_PATH, :$-d, :$*, :$., :$-w, :$+, :$@, :$`, :$stdin, :$1, :$2, :$3, :$4, :$5, :$6, :$7, :$8, :$9]
File admin_controller.rb
has 263 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AdminController < ApplicationController
layout :determine_layout
before_action :cache_setup
DEBUG_BLACKLIST = [:"$,", :$ADDITIONAL_ONTOLOGY_DETAILS, :$rdebug_state, :$PROGRAM_NAME, :$LOADED_FEATURES, :$KCODE, :$-i, :$rails_rake_task, :$$, :$gems_build_rake_task, :$daemons_stop_proc, :$VERBOSE, :$DAEMONS_ARGV, :$daemons_sigterm, :$DEBUG_BEFORE, :$stdout, :$-0, :$-l, :$-I, :$DEBUG, :$', :$gems_rake_task, :$_, :$CODERAY_DEBUG, :$-F, :$", :$0, :$=, :$FILENAME, :$?, :$!, :$rdebug_in_irb, :$-K, :$TESTING, :$fileutils_rb_have_lchmod, :$EMAIL_EXCEPTIONS, :$binding, :$-v, :$>, :$SAFE, :$/, :$fileutils_rb_have_lchown, :$-p, :$-W, :$:, :$__dbg_interface, :$stderr, :$\, :$&, :$<, :$debug, :$;, :$~, :$-a, :$DEBUG_RDOC, :$CGI_ENV, :$LOAD_PATH, :$-d, :$*, :$., :$-w, :$+, :$@, :$`, :$stdin, :$1, :$2, :$3, :$4, :$5, :$6, :$7, :$8, :$9]
Method delete_submission
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_submission
response = { errors: '', success: '' }
begin
ont = params['acronym']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _process_ontologies
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _process_ontologies(success_keyword, error_keyword, process_proc)
response = { errors: '', success: '' }
if params['ontologies'].blank?
response[:errors] = "No ontologies parameter passed. Syntax: ?ontologies=ONT1,ONT2,...,ONTN"
Method _process_errors
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _process_errors(errors, response, remove_trailing_comma = true)
if errors.is_a?(Hash)
errors.each do |_, v|
if v.is_a?(Array)
response[:errors] += v.join(', ')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method refresh_ontologies_report
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def refresh_ontologies_report
response = { errors: '', success: '' }
begin
response_raw = LinkedData::Client::HTTP.post(ONTOLOGIES_URL, params, raw: true)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def clear_goo_cache
response = { errors: '', success: '' }
begin
LinkedData::Client::HTTP.post("#{ADMIN_URL}clear_goo_cache", params, raw: true)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def clear_http_cache
response = { errors: '', success: '' }
begin
LinkedData::Client::HTTP.post("#{ADMIN_URL}clear_http_cache", params, raw: true)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76