Showing 628 of 628 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
lunr.Index.prototype.field = function (fieldName, opts) {
var opts = opts || {},
field = { name: fieldName, boost: opts.boost || 1 }
this._fields.push(field)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 84.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function jumpTo_formatItem
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function jumpTo_formatItem(row) {
var specials = new RegExp("[.*+?|()\\[\\]{}\\\\]", "g"), // .*+?|()[]{}\
keywords = jQuery(jumpTo_searchBoxSelector).val().trim().replace(specials, "\\$&").split(' ').join('|'),
regex = new RegExp('(' + keywords + ')', 'gi');
var resultTypeSpan = jQuery("<span>");
Method show
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
# Hack to make ontologyid and conceptid work in addition to id and ontology params
params[:id] = params[:id].nil? ? params[:ontologyid] : params[:id]
params[:ontology] = params[:ontology].nil? ? params[:id] : params[:ontology]
Method concept_properties2hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def concept_properties2hash(properties)
# NOTE: example properties
#
# properties
#=> #<struct
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function $Browser
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
angular.mock.$Browser = function() {
var self = this;
this.isMock = true;
self.$$url = "http://server/";
Method get_class
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_class(params)
if @ontology.flat?
ignore_concept_param = params[:conceptid].nil? ||
Function get_annotations
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function get_annotations() {
jQuery("#results_error").html("");
jQuery("#annotator_error").html("");
// Validation
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
lunr.SortedSet.prototype.clone = function () {
var clone = new lunr.SortedSet
clone.elements = this.toArray()
clone.length = clone.elements.length
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
lunr.SortedSet.prototype.clone = function () {
var clone = new lunr.SortedSet
clone.elements = this.toArray()
clone.length = clone.elements.length
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File quick_jump.js
has 264 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// jQuery check, if it's not present then include it
// jQuery check, if it's not present then include it
function bpMinVersion(min, actual) {
function parseVersionString (str) {
if (typeof(str) != 'string') { return false; }
Class AdminController
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AdminController < ApplicationController
layout :determine_layout
before_action :cache_setup
DEBUG_BLACKLIST = [:"$,", :$ADDITIONAL_ONTOLOGY_DETAILS, :$rdebug_state, :$PROGRAM_NAME, :$LOADED_FEATURES, :$KCODE, :$-i, :$rails_rake_task, :$$, :$gems_build_rake_task, :$daemons_stop_proc, :$VERBOSE, :$DAEMONS_ARGV, :$daemons_sigterm, :$DEBUG_BEFORE, :$stdout, :$-0, :$-l, :$-I, :$DEBUG, :$', :$gems_rake_task, :$_, :$CODERAY_DEBUG, :$-F, :$", :$0, :$=, :$FILENAME, :$?, :$!, :$rdebug_in_irb, :$-K, :$TESTING, :$fileutils_rb_have_lchmod, :$EMAIL_EXCEPTIONS, :$binding, :$-v, :$>, :$SAFE, :$/, :$fileutils_rb_have_lchown, :$-p, :$-W, :$:, :$__dbg_interface, :$stderr, :$\, :$&, :$<, :$debug, :$;, :$~, :$-a, :$DEBUG_RDOC, :$CGI_ENV, :$LOAD_PATH, :$-d, :$*, :$., :$-w, :$+, :$@, :$`, :$stdin, :$1, :$2, :$3, :$4, :$5, :$6, :$7, :$8, :$9]
Function update_annotations_table
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function update_annotations_table(rowsArray) {
"use strict";
var ontologies = {},
classes = {},
match_types = {},
Function update_annotations_table
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function update_annotations_table(rowsArray) {
"use strict";
var ontologies = {},
classes = {},
match_types = {},
File admin_controller.rb
has 263 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AdminController < ApplicationController
layout :determine_layout
before_action :cache_setup
DEBUG_BLACKLIST = [:"$,", :$ADDITIONAL_ONTOLOGY_DETAILS, :$rdebug_state, :$PROGRAM_NAME, :$LOADED_FEATURES, :$KCODE, :$-i, :$rails_rake_task, :$$, :$gems_build_rake_task, :$daemons_stop_proc, :$VERBOSE, :$DAEMONS_ARGV, :$daemons_sigterm, :$DEBUG_BEFORE, :$stdout, :$-0, :$-l, :$-I, :$DEBUG, :$', :$gems_rake_task, :$_, :$CODERAY_DEBUG, :$-F, :$", :$0, :$=, :$FILENAME, :$?, :$!, :$rdebug_in_irb, :$-K, :$TESTING, :$fileutils_rb_have_lchmod, :$EMAIL_EXCEPTIONS, :$binding, :$-v, :$>, :$SAFE, :$/, :$fileutils_rb_have_lchown, :$-p, :$-W, :$:, :$__dbg_interface, :$stderr, :$\, :$&, :$<, :$debug, :$;, :$~, :$-a, :$DEBUG_RDOC, :$CGI_ENV, :$LOAD_PATH, :$-d, :$*, :$., :$-w, :$+, :$@, :$`, :$stdin, :$1, :$2, :$3, :$4, :$5, :$6, :$7, :$8, :$9]
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
lunr.Pipeline.prototype.before = function (existingFn, newFn) {
lunr.Pipeline.warnIfFunctionNotRegistered(newFn)
var pos = this._stack.indexOf(existingFn)
this._stack.splice(pos, 0, newFn)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 81.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
lunr.Pipeline.prototype.before = function (existingFn, newFn) {
lunr.Pipeline.warnIfFunctionNotRegistered(newFn)
var pos = this._stack.indexOf(existingFn)
this._stack.splice(pos, 0, newFn)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 81.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function $httpBackend
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function $httpBackend(method, url, data, callback, headers, timeout, withCredentials) {
var xhr = new MockXhr(),
expectation = expectations[0],
wasExpected = false;
Function onSuccessAction
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
AjaxAction.prototype.onSuccessAction = function(data, ontology, deferredObj) {
var self = this;
if (!self.isLongOperation) {
return;
}
Function formComplete_formatItem
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formComplete_formatItem(row) {
var input = this.extraParams.input;
var BP_include_definitions = jQuery(input).attr("data-bp_include_definitions");
if (typeof BP_include_definitions === "undefined") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method feedback
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def feedback
# Show the header/footer or not
feedback_layout = params[:pop].eql?('true') ? 'popup' : 'ontology'
# We're using a hidden form field to trigger for error checking
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"