Showing 628 of 628 total issues
Function init
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.init = function() {
ROOT.html($("<span>").html("Loading...").css("font-size", "smaller"));
$.ajax({
url: obj.determineHTTPS(OPTIONS.ncboUIURL) + "/ajax/properties/tree",
data: {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
lunr.Vector.prototype.similarity = function (otherVector) {
return this.dot(otherVector) / (this.magnitude() * otherVector.magnitude())
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
lunr.Vector.prototype.similarity = function (otherVector) {
return this.dot(otherVector) / (this.magnitude() * otherVector.magnitude())
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method delete_submission
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_submission
response = { errors: '', success: '' }
begin
ont = params['acronym']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
ontology_list = LinkedData::Client::Models::Ontology.all.select { |o| !o.summaryOnly }
ontologies_mapping_count = LinkedData::Client::HTTP.get("#{MAPPINGS_URL}/statistics/ontologies")
ontologies_hash = {}
ontology_list.each do |ontology|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
if params[:url] # We were provided with a url to redirect to
params_string = ""
# Trigger to switch the placeholders
first_param = true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method format_metric_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format_metric_list(metrics, metric, title)
return 0 if metric.nil?
markup = ""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function init
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.init = function() {
$TREE_CONTAINER = element;
TREE = $("<ul>").append($("<li>").addClass("root"));
ROOT = $('.root', TREE);
TREE.css("width", OPTIONS.width).addClass(OPTIONS.treeClass);
Function init
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.init = function() {
$TREE_CONTAINER = element;
TREE = $("<ul>").append($("<li>").addClass("root"));
ROOT = $('.root', TREE);
TREE.css("width", OPTIONS.width).addClass(OPTIONS.treeClass);
Function parseName
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseName: function (name) {
var modName, ext, temp,
strip = false,
index = name.indexOf("."),
isRelative = name.indexOf('./') === 0 ||
Function $ExceptionHandlerProvider
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
angular.mock.$ExceptionHandlerProvider = function() {
var handler;
/**
* @ngdoc method
Function jumpTo_setup_functions
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function jumpTo_setup_functions() {
var extra_params = {
subtreerootconceptid: encodeURIComponent(BP_search_branch)
};
var result_width = 350;
Function init
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.init = function() {
$TREE_CONTAINER = element;
TREE = $("<ul>").append($("<li>").addClass("root"));
ROOT = $('.root', TREE);
TREE.css("width", OPTIONS.width).addClass(OPTIONS.treeClass);
Method simplify_ontology_model
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def simplify_ontology_model(ont_model)
id = nil
if ont_model.instance_of? Hash
id = ont_model['@id']
elsif ont_model.instance_of? LinkedData::Client::Models::Ontology
Method _process_ontologies
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _process_ontologies(success_keyword, error_keyword, process_proc)
response = { errors: '', success: '' }
if params['ontologies'].blank?
response[:errors] = "No ontologies parameter passed. Syntax: ?ontologies=ONT1,ONT2,...,ONTN"
Function _showStatusMessages
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _showStatusMessages(success, errors, notices, isAppendMode) {
if (success.length > 0) {
if (isAppendMode) {
var appendStr = (jQuery.trim(jQuery('#success_message').html()).length) ? ", " : "";
jQuery("#success_message").append(appendStr + success.join(", ")).html();
Method request_term
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request_term
response = {}
endpoint = "/RequestTerm"
h_params = {}
response_raw = nil
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var questions = raw.questions.map(function (q) {
return {
id: q.question_id,
title: q.title,
body: q.body,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var questions = JSON.parse(data).questions.map(function (raw) {
return {
id: raw.question_id,
title: raw.title,
body: raw.body,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function bioportal_autocomplete
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.fn.bioportal_autocomplete = function(url, options, data) {
// Make sure options exists
options = options || {};
// Set url as option
options.url = url;