netdata/netdata

View on GitHub
src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go

Summary

Maintainability
F
6 days
Test Coverage

Method Windows.collectNetFrameworkCLRMemory has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRMemory(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
    seen := make(map[string]bool)

    for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRMemoryAllocatedBytesTotal) {
        if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
Severity: Minor
Found in src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method Windows.collectNetFrameworkCLRMemory has 85 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRMemory(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
    seen := make(map[string]bool)

    for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRMemoryAllocatedBytesTotal) {
        if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
Severity: Major
Found in src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method Windows.collectNetFrameworkCLRRemoting has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRRemoting(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
        seen := make(map[string]bool)
    
        for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRRemotingChannelsTotal) {
            if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go - About 55 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method Windows.collectNetFrameworkCLRLoading has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRLoading(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
        seen := make(map[string]bool)
    
        for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRLoadingLoaderHeapSizeBytes) {
            if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go - About 55 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method Windows.collectNetFrameworkCLRLocksAndThreads has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRLocksAndThreads(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
        seen := make(map[string]bool)
    
        for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRLocksAndThreadsQueueLengthTotal) {
            if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRRemoting(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
        seen := make(map[string]bool)
    
        for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRRemotingChannelsTotal) {
            if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
    src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go on lines 173..231

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 667.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRLoading(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
        seen := make(map[string]bool)
    
        for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRLoadingLoaderHeapSizeBytes) {
            if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
    src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go on lines 420..478

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 667.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRJIT(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
        seen := make(map[string]bool)
    
        for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRJITMethodsTotal) {
            if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
    src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go on lines 20..64
    src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go on lines 487..531

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 499.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRSecurity(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
        seen := make(map[string]bool)
    
        for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRSecurityLinkTimeChecksTotal) {
            if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
    src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go on lines 20..64
    src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go on lines 118..162

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 499.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    func (w *Windows) collectNetFrameworkCLRExceptions(mx map[string]int64, pms prometheus.Series) {
        seen := make(map[string]bool)
    
        for _, pm := range pms.FindByName(metricNetFrameworkCLRExceptionsThrownTotal) {
            if name := cleanProcessName(pm.Labels.Get("process")); name != "" {
    src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go on lines 118..162
    src/go/collectors/go.d.plugin/modules/windows/collect_netframework.go on lines 487..531

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 499.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status