Showing 197 of 197 total issues
Method generate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate(no_term_specs: false, no_base_specs: false, no_spec_specs: false, no_reactions: false)
@atoms_format = '%25s | %5s | %10s | %4s | %s'
puts @atoms_format % %w(Image Index Lattice Name Parents)
print_atoms('Atoms', classifier.props)
puts
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method merge_props
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_props(other, &block)
same_unit_states = UNIT_STATES.all? { |mn| send(mn) == other.send(mn) }
is_valid_lts = lattice == other.lattice ||
(!lattice && other.lattice) || (lattice && !other.lattice)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File base_grouped_nodes.rb
has 260 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module VersatileDiamond
using Patches::RichArray
module Generators
module Code
File atom_classifier.rb
has 257 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module VersatileDiamond
module Organizers
# Classifies atoms in specs and associate each atom type with some value,
# which will be used for detecting overlapping specs between each other
Class DependentSpecificSpec
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class DependentSpecificSpec < DependentWrappedSpec
include Modules::GraphDupper
def_delegators :spec, :reduced, :could_be_reduced?
Method collect_specific_specs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_specific_specs
cache = {}
(all_reactions + [theres]).each do |dept_concepts|
dept_concepts.each do |dept_concept|
is_ubiquitous = ubiquitous_reactions.include?(dept_concept)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method latticed_relation_params_of
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def latticed_relation_params_of(node)
neighbour_spec_atoms(node.product).each_with_object([]) do |sa, acc|
nbr = @prd_to_src_mirror[sa]
if nbr && nbr.lattice
prd_rel = relation_between_products(nbr, node)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method contain_times
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def contain_times(latticed_props, props)
diff = latticed_props - props
if diff
num = 1
if !diff.zero? && props.include?(diff)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File mapping_result.rb
has 253 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module VersatileDiamond
module Mcs
# Contains reactants and mapping result (how change each atom of stuctures)
class MappingResult
Method non_complete_groups
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def non_complete_groups
flatten_face_grouped_nodes.each_with_object([]) do |group, acc|
next unless group.one?
rels = small_ungrouped_graph[group.first]
next unless rels.one?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method overlaps_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def overlaps_for(atoms, complex_child: false)
@self_insec.each_with_object([]) do |intersec, all_overlaps|
overlap = {}
check_lambda = presented_in(overlap)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method equation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def equation(str)
sides = Matcher.equation(str)
syntax_error('.invalid') unless sides
names_and_specs = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_gnuplot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_gnuplot(filename, title, xlabel, ylabel, &block)
Gnuplot.open do |gp|
Gnuplot::Plot.new(gp) do |plot|
plot.output("#{config.filepath(filename)}")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_slices
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_slices
types, concs = nil
File.open(config.filename) do |f|
lines = f.readlines
types = lines.shift.scan(/\d+/)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(g1, g2, comparer: nil, bonds_checker: nil, &block)
@g1, @g2 = g1, g2
comparer ||= -> _, _, v, w { v.same?(w) }
Method find_intersec
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_intersec
big_mapped_vertices, small_mapped_vertices = [], []
lattices_variants = nil
loop do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method deep_find_positions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deep_find_positions(reaction, main_spec, main_atoms, position)
crystal = main_atoms.first.lattice.instance
return unless crystal.flatten?(position)
rel_groups = main_atoms.map do |a|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method []
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def [](var, type: nil, value: nil, constructor_args: nil)
if !var.tin? && (var.const? || var.type? || var.assign?)
arg_err!("Cannot define not variable #{var.inspect}")
elsif type && !type.type?
arg_err!("Wrong type #{type.inspect} of defining variable")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method common_plus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def common_plus(other, total_props)
lattices_num = total_props[:nbr_lattices].select(&:last).size
total_unfixed = total_props[:relevants].include?(UNFIXED)
return if total_unfixed && lattices_num > 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method replace_in_links
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def replace_in_links(from, to)
if links[from] && links[to]
exchange_targets_in_links do |sa|
if sa == to
from
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"