Sign upLogin

nil0x42/phpsploit

View on GitHub
Star
src/core/session/__init__.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Function _obj_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _obj_value(self, raw=None, fatal_errors=True):
        """Restore Session() from its 'built-in types only' representation.
        Used to get back Session() from data returned by _raw_value() method

        >>> from core import session
Severity: Minor
Found in src/core/session/__init__.py - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File __init__.py has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""PhpSploit Session Manager

When imorted for the first time, the "session" package initializes it
self as a PhpSploit blank session, with its default values.
Severity: Minor
Found in src/core/session/__init__.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method update. (10)
    Open

        def update(self, obj=None, update_history=False):
        """Update current session with `obj`.
        The given argument can be a dictionnary instance, in which case
        it must be a valid session object to merge in.
        If `obj` is a string, it is then considered as a file path, and
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method dump. (8)
    Open

        def dump(self, file=None, ask_confirmation=True):
        """Dump current session to `file`.
        `file` defaults to self.File if unset.
        """
        if file is None:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _raw_value. (8)
    Open

        def _raw_value(self, sess=None):
        """Get a 'built-in types only' representation of `sess`
        Session() object.

        This @staticmethod is guaranted to return only python built-in
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __call__. (7)
    Open

        def __call__(self, file=None, fatal_errors=True):
        """Load and return the session object stored in `file`.
        if `file` is None, current session (self) is returned.

        """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method diff. (7)
    Open

        def diff(self, file=None, display_diff=False):
        """This function returns True is the given `file` is
        a phpsploit session which differs from current session.
        Otherwise, False is returned.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function diff has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def diff(self, file=None, display_diff=False):
        """This function returns True is the given `file` is
        a phpsploit session which differs from current session.
        Otherwise, False is returned.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _history_update. (6)
    Open

        def _history_update(self, array=None):
        if array is None:
            array = []
        try:
            import readline
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function _raw_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def _raw_value(self, sess=None):
        """Get a 'built-in types only' representation of `sess`
        Session() object.

        This @staticmethod is guaranted to return only python built-in
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function update has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def update(self, obj=None, update_history=False):
        """Update current session with `obj`.
        The given argument can be a dictionnary instance, in which case
        it must be a valid session object to merge in.
        If `obj` is a string, it is then considered as a file path, and
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __call__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __call__(self, file=None, fatal_errors=True):
        """Load and return the session object stored in `file`.
        if `file` is None, current session (self) is returned.

        """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function dump has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def dump(self, file=None, ask_confirmation=True):
        """Dump current session to `file`.
        `file` defaults to self.File if unset.
        """
        if file is None:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 31 to the 15 allowed.
    Open

        def _obj_value(self, raw=None, fatal_errors=True):
    Severity: Critical
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by sonar-python

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

    See

    Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "182" or change one of the implementations.
    Open

                    self[key] = value
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by sonar-python

    Having two branches in the same if structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    if 0 <= a < 10:
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
    do_the_thing()  # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 4 if a > 12 else 4

    Compliant Solution

    if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50):
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 4

    or 

    if 0 <= a < 10:
    do_the_thing()
elif 10 <= a < 20:
    do_the_other_thing()
elif 20 <= a < 50:
    do_the_third_thing()
else:
    do_the_rest()

b = 8 if a > 12 else 4

    Remove this commented out code.
    Open

            # deco = "\n" + colorize("%Blue", "=" * len(title)) + "\n"
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by sonar-python

    Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.

    Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.

    See

    • MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
    • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
    • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
    • MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

    Merge this if statement with the enclosing one.
    Open

                if file != self.File or super().__getitem__("File") is None:
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py by sonar-python

    Merging collapsible if statements increases the code's readability.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    if condition1:
    if condition2:
        # ...

    Compliant Solution

    if condition1 and condition2:
    # ...

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                for line in difflines:
                # dont be too much verbose...
                if line.startswith('?'):
                    continue
                print(colorize(color[line[0]], line))
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/core/session/__init__.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
    src/ui/color.py on lines 124..127

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 32.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status