nil0x42/phpsploit

View on GitHub
src/linebuf.py

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

File linebuf.py has 278 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""Provide advanced line-buffers for phpsploit session settings"""

import os
import hashlib
import random
Severity: Minor
Found in src/linebuf.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (10)
    Open

        def __init__(self, value, validator=None):
            if not hasattr(self, "desc"):
                raise NotImplementedError("`desc` (description) attribute"
                                          "is not defined")
            if validator is None:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method choices. (7)
    Open

        def choices(self, buffer=None):
            """get a list of potential *usable-value lines. I.e. lines
            validated by self._validator().
    
            Empty lines and comment lines (starting with '#') are ignored.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __iadd__. (6)
    Open

        def __iadd__(self, new):
            """allow strings being concatenated to the end of buffer.
            If string starts with 'file://', suffix is used as new
            *parent-filepath
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __getattribute__. (6)
    Open

        def __getattribute__(self, name):
            """automatically update self.buffer from self.file
            whenever it is possible
            """
            if name == "buffer" and self.file:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __init__(self, value, validator=None):
            if not hasattr(self, "desc"):
                raise NotImplementedError("`desc` (description) attribute"
                                          "is not defined")
            if validator is None:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function choices has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def choices(self, buffer=None):
            """get a list of potential *usable-value lines. I.e. lines
            validated by self._validator().
    
            Empty lines and comment lines (starting with '#') are ignored.
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            if not self.file and len(self.buffer.splitlines()) == 1:
                return str(self._validator(self.buffer.strip()))
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/linebuf.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
    src/linebuf.py on lines 242..243

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 50.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            if not self.file and len(self.buffer.splitlines()) == 1:
                return str(self._validator(self.buffer.strip()))
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/linebuf.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
    src/linebuf.py on lines 312..313

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 50.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    At least two spaces before inline comment
    Open

            if type(value) is not str: # pylint: disable=unidiomatic-typecheck
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py by pep8

    Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.

    An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
    Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
    statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
    
    Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
    (unless it is indented text inside the comment).
    
    Okay: x = x + 1  # Increment x
    Okay: x = x + 1    # Increment x
    Okay: # Block comment
    E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
    E262: x = x + 1  #Increment x
    E262: x = x + 1  #  Increment x
    E265: #Block comment
    E266: ### Block comment

    At least two spaces before inline comment
    Open

                    except: # pylint: disable=bare-except
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py by pep8

    Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.

    An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
    Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
    statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
    
    Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
    (unless it is indented text inside the comment).
    
    Okay: x = x + 1  # Increment x
    Okay: x = x + 1    # Increment x
    Okay: # Block comment
    E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
    E262: x = x + 1  #Increment x
    E262: x = x + 1  #  Increment x
    E265: #Block comment
    E266: ### Block comment

    Do not use bare 'except'
    Open

                    except: # pylint: disable=bare-except
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/linebuf.py by pep8

    When catching exceptions, mention specific exceptions when possible.

    Okay: except Exception:
    Okay: except BaseException:
    E722: except:

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status