Sign upLogin

nil0x42/phpsploit

View on GitHub
Star
src/ui/interface.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage

File interface.py has 883 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""PhpSploit shell interface

Handles general behavior of Phpsploit interactive command-line interface.
"""
# pylint: disable=too-many-lines
Severity: Major
Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 2 days to fix

    Function do_help has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def do_help(self, argv):
        """Show commands help

        SYNOPSIS:
            help
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Shell has 33 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class Shell(shnake.Shell):
    """PhpSploit shell interface"""

    prompt = colorize('%Lined', 'phpsploit', '%Reset', ' > ')
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 4 hrs to fix

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method do_help. (20)
      Open

          def do_help(self, argv):
        """Show commands help

        SYNOPSIS:
            help
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_session. (13)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def complete_session(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `session` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] != " ") or len(argv) == 1:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method do_exit. (12)
      Open

          def do_exit(self, argv):
        """Quit current shell interface

        SYNOPSIS:
            exit [--force]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function do_exit has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def do_exit(self, argv):
        """Quit current shell interface

        SYNOPSIS:
            exit [--force]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function do_session has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def do_session(argv):
        """phpsploit session handler

        SYNOPSIS:
            session [load|diff] [<FILE>]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_help. (10)
      Open

          def complete_help(self, text, line, *_):
        """Use settings as `set` completers (case insensitive)"""
        argv = line.split()
        if argv[:2] == ["help", "set"]:
            if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") \
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method do_session. (10)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def do_session(argv):
        """phpsploit session handler

        SYNOPSIS:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method do_alias. (9)
      Open

          def do_alias(self, argv):
        """Define command aliases

        SYNOPSIS:
            alias [<NAME> ["<VALUE>"|None]]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method do_corectl. (9)
      Open

          def do_corectl(self, argv):
        """Advanced core debugging utils

        SYNOPSIS:
            corectl <TOOL>
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method completenames. (8)
      Open

          def completenames(self, text, line, *_):
        """Add aliases and plugins for completion"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
            return []
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method do_set. (8)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def do_set(argv):
        """view and edit configuration settings

        SYNOPSIS:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method precmd. (8)
      Open

          def precmd(self, argv):
        """Handle pre command hooks such as session aliases"""
        # Make 'nocmd' error message explicit if tunnel is connected
        self.nocmd = self._nocmd
        if tunnel:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_bind. (7)
      Open

          def complete_bind(self, text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `bind` command"""
        result = self.completenames(text, line, *_)
        if not result:
            return []
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function do_set has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def do_set(argv):
        """view and edit configuration settings

        SYNOPSIS:
            set [<VAR> [+] ["<VALUE>"]]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_exit. (6)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def complete_exit(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `exit` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_alias. (6)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def complete_alias(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `alias` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Shell. (6)
      Open

      class Shell(shnake.Shell):
    """PhpSploit shell interface"""

    prompt = colorize('%Lined', 'phpsploit', '%Reset', ' > ')
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_set. (6)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def complete_set(text, line, *_):
        """Use settings as `set` completers (case insensitive)"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_corectl. (6)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def complete_corectl(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `corectl` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_exploit. (6)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def complete_exploit(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `exploit` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method complete_env. (6)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def complete_env(text, line, *_):
        """Use env vars as `env` completers (case insensitive)"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function complete_session has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def complete_session(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `session` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] != " ") or len(argv) == 1:
            keys = ['save', 'diff', 'upgrade']
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function do_corectl has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def do_corectl(self, argv):
        """Advanced core debugging utils

        SYNOPSIS:
            corectl <TOOL>
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function do_alias has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def do_alias(self, argv):
        """Define command aliases

        SYNOPSIS:
            alias [<NAME> ["<VALUE>"|None]]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function complete_help has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def complete_help(self, text, line, *_):
        """Use settings as `set` completers (case insensitive)"""
        argv = line.split()
        if argv[:2] == ["help", "set"]:
            if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") \
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 55 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function precmd has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def precmd(self, argv):
        """Handle pre command hooks such as session aliases"""
        # Make 'nocmd' error message explicit if tunnel is connected
        self.nocmd = self._nocmd
        if tunnel:
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

              return tunnel.open()  # it raises exception if fails
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

                    return False
        Severity: Major
        Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this function.
          Open

                          return False
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 30 mins to fix

            Avoid too many return statements within this function.
            Open

                        return True
            Severity: Major
            Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 30 mins to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this function.
              Open

                      return False
              Severity: Major
              Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 30 mins to fix

                Avoid too many return statements within this function.
                Open

                                return self.interpret("alias %s" % argv[1])
                Severity: Major
                Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 30 mins to fix

                  Function complete_alias has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def complete_alias(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `alias` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
            return []
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 25 mins to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Function complete_env has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def complete_env(text, line, *_):
        """Use env vars as `env` completers (case insensitive)"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
            return []
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 25 mins to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Function complete_set has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def complete_set(text, line, *_):
        """Use settings as `set` completers (case insensitive)"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
            return []
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py - About 25 mins to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 55 to the 15 allowed.
                  Open

                      def do_help(self, argv):
                  Severity: Critical
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by sonar-python

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

                  See

                  Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 19 to the 15 allowed.
                  Open

                      def do_session(argv):
                  Severity: Critical
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by sonar-python

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

                  See

                  Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 21 to the 15 allowed.
                  Open

                      def do_exit(self, argv):
                  Severity: Critical
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by sonar-python

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

                  See

                  Merge this if statement with the enclosing one.
                  Open

                                  if os.path.isfile(session.File):
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by sonar-python

                  Merging collapsible if statements increases the code's readability.

                  Noncompliant Code Example

                  if condition1:
    if condition2:
        # ...

                  Compliant Solution

                  if condition1 and condition2:
    # ...

                  Remove this commented out code.
                  Open

                                  # self.bind_command = None
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by sonar-python

                  Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.

                  Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.

                  See

                  • MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
                  • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
                  • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
                  • MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

                  Merge this if statement with the enclosing one.
                  Open

                              if argv[1] in ["save", "load", "diff"]:
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by sonar-python

                  Merging collapsible if statements increases the code's readability.

                  Noncompliant Code Example

                  if condition1:
    if condition2:
        # ...

                  Compliant Solution

                  if condition1 and condition2:
    # ...

                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      @staticmethod
    def complete_exploit(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `exploit` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
                  src/ui/interface.py on lines 146..153

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 96.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      @staticmethod
    def complete_exit(text, line, *_):
        """autocompletion for `exit` command"""
        argv = line.split()
        if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") or len(argv) > 2:
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
                  src/ui/interface.py on lines 343..350

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 96.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                          if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") \
                or (len(argv) == 3 and line[-1] != " "):
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                  src/ui/interface.py on lines 936..937

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 60.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                              if (len(argv) == 2 and line[-1] == " ") \
                    or (len(argv) == 3 and line[-1] != " "):
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                  src/ui/interface.py on lines 428..429

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 60.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                              if grp_name == "Command Aliases":
                print("\n" + grp_name + "\n" + underline + "\n"
                      "    Alias  " + cmd_col + "Value\n"
                      "    -----  " + cmd_col + "-----")
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
                  src/ui/interface.py on lines 1071..1078

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 51.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  The backslash is redundant between brackets
                  Open

                                  print("[-] %s: No such setting (run `set` to list settings)" \
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Avoid explicit line join between brackets.

                  The preferred way of wrapping long lines is by using Python's
implied line continuation inside parentheses, brackets and braces.
Long lines can be broken over multiple lines by wrapping expressions
in parentheses.  These should be used in preference to using a
backslash for line continuation.

E502: aaa = [123, \\n       123]
E502: aaa = ("bbb " \\n       "ccc")

Okay: aaa = [123,\n       123]
Okay: aaa = ("bbb "\n       "ccc")
Okay: aaa = "bbb " \\n    "ccc"
Okay: aaa = 123  # \\

                  Expected 1 blank line, found 0
                  Open

                      def do_backlog(self, argv):
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.

                  Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.

Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions.  Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).

Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.

Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1

E301: class Foo:\n    b = 0\n    def bar():\n        pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n    pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n    pass
E305: def a():\n    pass\na()
E306: def a():\n    def b():\n        pass\n    def c():\n        pass

                  At least two spaces before inline comment
                  Open

                          return True # make pylint happy
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.

                  An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
statement. They should start with a # and a single space.

Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
(unless it is indented text inside the comment).

Okay: x = x + 1  # Increment x
Okay: x = x + 1    # Increment x
Okay: # Block comment
E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E262: x = x + 1  #Increment x
E262: x = x + 1  #  Increment x
E265: #Block comment
E266: ### Block comment

                  Too many blank lines (2)
                  Open

                      ##################
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.

                  Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.

Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions.  Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).

Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.

Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1

E301: class Foo:\n    b = 0\n    def bar():\n        pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n    pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n    pass
E305: def a():\n    pass\na()
E306: def a():\n    def b():\n        pass\n    def c():\n        pass

                  Too many blank lines (2)
                  Open

                      ####################
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.

                  Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.

Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions.  Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).

Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.

Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1

E301: class Foo:\n    b = 0\n    def bar():\n        pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n    pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n    pass
E305: def a():\n    pass\na()
E306: def a():\n    def b():\n        pass\n    def c():\n        pass

                  Expected 1 blank line, found 0
                  Open

                      def complete_bind(self, text, line, *_):
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.

                  Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.

Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions.  Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).

Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.

Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1

E301: class Foo:\n    b = 0\n    def bar():\n        pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n    pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n    pass
E305: def a():\n    pass\na()
E306: def a():\n    def b():\n        pass\n    def c():\n        pass

                  Expected 1 blank line, found 0
                  Open

                      def complete_help(self, text, line, *_):
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.

                  Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.

Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions.  Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).

Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.

Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1

E301: class Foo:\n    b = 0\n    def bar():\n        pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n    pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n    pass
E305: def a():\n    pass\na()
E306: def a():\n    def b():\n        pass\n    def c():\n        pass

                  Continuation line over-indented for visual indent
                  Open

                                          % var)
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Continuation lines indentation.

                  Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

                  Too many blank lines (2)
                  Open

                      #################
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.

                  Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.

Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions.  Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).

Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.

Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n    pass
Okay: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n    pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1

E301: class Foo:\n    b = 0\n    def bar():\n        pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E302: def a():\n    pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n    pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n    pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n    pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n    pass
E305: def a():\n    pass\na()
E306: def a():\n    def b():\n        pass\n    def c():\n        pass

                  Do not use bare 'except'
                  Open

                              except:
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in src/ui/interface.py by pep8

                  When catching exceptions, mention specific exceptions when possible.

                  Okay: except Exception:
Okay: except BaseException:
E722: except:

                  There are no issues that match your filters.

                  Category
                  Status