Showing 1,083 of 1,083 total issues
Method has too many lines. [16/10] Open
def change
create_table :users do |t|
## Database authenticatable
t.boolean :admin
t.string :email, null: false, default: ""
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for update is too high. [19.95/15] Open
def update
@dedication = Dedication.find(params[:id])
@dedication.dedication = params[:dedication][:dedication]
@dedication.status = params[:dedication][:status]
if params[:publish]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for show is too high. [19.62/15] Open
def show
@dedication = Dedication.find_by_id(params[:id])
@donor_logged_in = false
if current_user
@donor_logged_in = current_user.donor == @dedication.donor || current_user.admin?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def show
@donor = Donor.find_by_id(params[:id])
if @donor.nil? or @donor.status == false
@error = 'Donor'
render 'errors/status'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for index is too high. [18.68/15] Open
def index
@dedications = Dedication.visible
@filterrific = initialize_filterrific(
Dedication.visible,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [13/10] Open
def change
create_table :hospitals do |t|
t.string :name
t.string :city
t.integer :surgeries
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Perceived complexity for create is too high. [9/7] Open
def create
@donor = Donor.find(params[:user][:donor_id])
if @donor.user != nil
flash[:error] = "There is already an account associated with this email. Log in or contact an admin."
redirect_to '/users/sign_up?donor_id=' + params[:user][:donor_id].to_s + '&secret=' + params[:user][:secret]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method has too many lines. [12/10] Open
def show
@dedication = Dedication.find_by_id(params[:id])
@donor_logged_in = false
if current_user
@donor_logged_in = current_user.donor == @dedication.donor || current_user.admin?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for show is too high. [17.92/15] Open
def show
@donor = Donor.find_by_id(params[:id])
if @donor.nil? or @donor.status == false
@error = 'Donor'
render 'errors/status'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [11/10] Open
def dedications_by_tier(published)
dbt = Hash.new
if published
Dedication.tiers.each do |tier|
dbt[tier] = Dedication.where(:donor => self.id, :tier => tier, :published => published)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Perceived complexity for create is too high. [8/7] Open
def create
begin
@contact_form = ContactForm.new(params[:contact_form])
@spam = false
if not @contact_form.nickname.empty?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
config.wrappers :inline_form, tag: 'div', class: 'form-group', error_class: 'has-error' do |b|
b.use :html5
b.use :placeholder
b.optional :maxlength
b.optional :pattern
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
config.wrappers :vertical_form, tag: 'div', class: 'form-group', error_class: 'has-error' do |b|
b.use :html5
b.use :placeholder
b.optional :maxlength
b.optional :pattern
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@donor = Donor.find(params[:user][:donor_id])
if @donor.user != nil
flash[:error] = "There is already an account associated with this email. Log in or contact an admin."
redirect_to '/users/sign_up?donor_id=' + params[:user][:donor_id].to_s + '&secret=' + params[:user][:secret]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if not Donor.exists?(donor[:id])
Donor.create!(donor)
elsif Donor.find(donor[:id]).status.nil?
d = Donor.find(donor[:id])
d.update(status: donor[:status])
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if not Dedication.exists?(dedication[:id])
Dedication.create!(dedication)
elsif Dedication.find(dedication[:id]).status.nil?
d = Dedication.find(dedication[:id])
d.update(status: dedication[:status])
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method create
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@donor = Donor.find(params[:user][:donor_id])
if @donor.user != nil
flash[:error] = "There is already an account associated with this email. Log in or contact an admin."
redirect_to '/users/sign_up?donor_id=' + params[:user][:donor_id].to_s + '&secret=' + params[:user][:secret]
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
begin
@contact_form = ContactForm.new(params[:contact_form])
@spam = false
if not @contact_form.nickname.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Denial of Service Vulnerability in Action View Open
actionview (4.2.6)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2019-5419
Criticality: High
URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/GN7w9fFAQeI
Solution: upgrade to >= 6.0.0.beta3, >= 5.2.2.1, ~> 5.2.2, >= 5.1.6.2, ~> 5.1.6, >= 5.0.7.2, ~> 5.0.7, >= 4.2.11.1, ~> 4.2.11
Potential remote code execution of user-provided local names in ActionView Open
actionview (4.2.6)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2020-8163
Criticality: High
URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/hWuKcHyoKh0
Solution: upgrade to >= 4.2.11.2