Showing 7 of 7 total issues
Function flatten
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static flatten (objExp, userOptions) {
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(objExp) !== '[object Object]' && Object.prototype.toString.call(objExp) !== '[object Array]') {
return null
}
const options = this._mergeOptions(userOptions)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function expand
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static expand (objFlat, userOptions) {
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(objFlat) !== '[object Object]') {
return null
}
const options = this._mergeOptions(userOptions)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function flatten
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static flatten (objExp, userOptions) {
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(objExp) !== '[object Object]' && Object.prototype.toString.call(objExp) !== '[object Array]') {
return null
}
const options = this._mergeOptions(userOptions)
Function expand
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static expand (objFlat, userOptions) {
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(objFlat) !== '[object Object]') {
return null
}
const options = this._mergeOptions(userOptions)
Function recurse
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const recurse = (cur, prop, lev) => {
if (options.MaxDepth > 0 && lev >= options.MaxDepth) {
result[prop] = cur
return
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ((options.AutocreateArrays && this._isValidArrayIndex(nextChunk)) ||
(options.ExplicitArrays && this._containsValidArrayIndex(nextChunk))) {
obj[currChunk] = []
} else {
obj[currChunk] = {}
Function _mergeOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static _mergeOptions (userOptions) {
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(userOptions) === '[object Object]') {
for (let key of Object.keys(userOptions)) {
if (defaultOptions.hasOwnProperty(key) === false) {
throw new Error('Unsupported option: ' + key)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"