Showing 96 of 96 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return this.view('byTwitterId', params, opts || {})
.then(function (results) {
if (results.length === 0) {
return false;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return this.view('byEmail', params, opts || {})
.then(function (results) {
if (results.length === 0) {
return false;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return this.view('byFacebookId', params, opts || {})
.then(function (results) {
if (results.length === 0) {
return false;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function contains
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
GroupCollection.prototype.contains = function (id, opts) {
var keys = _.isArray(id) ? id : [id]
, self = this
, view = (opts && opts.view) ? opts.view : 'contains'; // Allow the user to override the view used
Function errorResponse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function errorResponse(config, req, err) {
var message = '<h3>Message:</h3>';
if (config.showError) {
if (typeof err === 'string') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (db) {
return function search (opts) {
var opts = _.extend({}, {include_docs: true}, opts || {});
if (!opts.filter && opts.collection) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validate
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
UserCollection.prototype.validate = function (user) {
var services = ['password', 'facebook', 'twitter']
, identifiers = ['email', 'facebookId', 'twitterId', 'username']
, userIdentifiers = [];
Function exports
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (app) {
return app.collection({
name: 'Page',
isPostType: true,
timestamps: true,
Function bogartHandlebarsCallback
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var callback = function bogartHandlebarsCallback(app, injector, next) {
var localsDefaults = {};
return Promise.all(loadViews)
.then(function (viewMapArray) {
Function exports
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (db) {
return function search (opts) {
var opts = _.extend({}, {include_docs: true}, opts || {});
if (!opts.filter && opts.collection) {
Function search
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return function search (opts) {
var opts = _.extend({}, {include_docs: true}, opts || {});
if (!opts.filter && opts.collection) {
if (typeof opts.collection === 'string') {
Function setup
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Collection.prototype.setup = function () {
var doc = helpers.designDoc(this);
var self = this;
var ensureStaticDocs = [];
Function search
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Collection.prototype.search = function (opts, filtered) {
/*
Only supports ElasticSearch since
that's what apps currently in
production were using before the
Function facebook
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function facebook (app) {
var router = app.router(false);
router.get('/facebook/login', function facebookLogin (req, next) {
Function getInput
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getInput (name, type) {
var base = '<div class="form-group">'
, $ = cheerio.load(base);
switch (type) {
Function errorResponse
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function errorResponse(config, req, err) {
var message = '<h3>Message:</h3>';
if (config.showError) {
if (typeof err === 'string') {
Function makeApiRoutes
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function makeApiRoutes (collection) {
// Get a router
var router = collection.router;
var name = inflection.dasherize(collection.name.toLowerCase());
Function exports
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function () {
var helpers = [
'res'
, 'file'
, 'text'
Function attachments
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function attachments (app) {
var router = app.router(false);
router.get('/attachment/:docId/:attId', function (req) {
var att;
Function put
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Database.prototype.put = function (name, doc, force) {
var args = []
, self = this;
if (force && force === true) {