Showing 64 of 64 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func _GreeterService_Hello_Handler(srv interface{}, ctx context.Context, dec func(interface{}) error, interceptor grpc.UnaryServerInterceptor) (interface{}, error) {
in := new(HelloRequest)
if err := dec(in); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 221.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function Run
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func Run(cnf *config.Server) *cobra.Command {
command := cobra.Command{
Use: "run",
Short: "run the server",
Long: "Start listening required protocols.",
Function file_v1_service_proto_init
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func file_v1_service_proto_init() {
if File_v1_service_proto != nil {
return
}
if !protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Method greeterServiceServer.serveHelloJSON
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *greeterServiceServer) serveHelloJSON(ctx context.Context, resp http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var err error
ctx = ctxsetters.WithMethodName(ctx, "Hello")
ctx, err = callRequestRouted(ctx, s.hooks)
if err != nil {
Method greeterServiceServer.serveSignJSON
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *greeterServiceServer) serveSignJSON(ctx context.Context, resp http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var err error
ctx = ctxsetters.WithMethodName(ctx, "Sign")
ctx, err = callRequestRouted(ctx, s.hooks)
if err != nil {
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *greeterServiceJSONClient) callSign(ctx context.Context, in *SignRequest) (*SignResponse, error) {
out := new(SignResponse)
ctx, err := doJSONRequest(ctx, c.client, c.opts.Hooks, c.urls[1], in, out)
if err != nil {
twerr, ok := err.(twirp.Error)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 178.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *greeterServiceJSONClient) callHello(ctx context.Context, in *HelloRequest) (*HelloResponse, error) {
out := new(HelloResponse)
ctx, err := doJSONRequest(ctx, c.client, c.opts.Hooks, c.urls[0], in, out)
if err != nil {
twerr, ok := err.(twirp.Error)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 178.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *greeterServiceProtobufClient) callHello(ctx context.Context, in *HelloRequest) (*HelloResponse, error) {
out := new(HelloResponse)
ctx, err := doProtobufRequest(ctx, c.client, c.opts.Hooks, c.urls[0], in, out)
if err != nil {
twerr, ok := err.(twirp.Error)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 178.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *greeterServiceProtobufClient) callSign(ctx context.Context, in *SignRequest) (*SignResponse, error) {
out := new(SignResponse)
ctx, err := doProtobufRequest(ctx, c.client, c.opts.Hooks, c.urls[1], in, out)
if err != nil {
twerr, ok := err.(twirp.Error)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 178.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method greeterServiceServer.serveSignProtobuf
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *greeterServiceServer) serveSignProtobuf(ctx context.Context, resp http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var err error
ctx = ctxsetters.WithMethodName(ctx, "Sign")
ctx, err = callRequestRouted(ctx, s.hooks)
if err != nil {
Method greeterServiceServer.serveHelloProtobuf
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *greeterServiceServer) serveHelloProtobuf(ctx context.Context, resp http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var err error
ctx = ctxsetters.WithMethodName(ctx, "Hello")
ctx, err = callRequestRouted(ctx, s.hooks)
if err != nil {
Function doProtobufRequest
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func doProtobufRequest(ctx context.Context, client HTTPClient, hooks *twirp.ClientHooks, url string, in, out proto.Message) (_ context.Context, err error) {
reqBodyBytes, err := proto.Marshal(in)
if err != nil {
return ctx, wrapInternal(err, "failed to marshal proto request")
}
Method greeterServiceServer.serveHelloProtobuf
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *greeterServiceServer) serveHelloProtobuf(ctx context.Context, resp http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var err error
ctx = ctxsetters.WithMethodName(ctx, "Hello")
ctx, err = callRequestRouted(ctx, s.hooks)
if err != nil {
Method greeterServiceServer.serveSignJSON
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *greeterServiceServer) serveSignJSON(ctx context.Context, resp http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var err error
ctx = ctxsetters.WithMethodName(ctx, "Sign")
ctx, err = callRequestRouted(ctx, s.hooks)
if err != nil {
Function doJSONRequest
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func doJSONRequest(ctx context.Context, client HTTPClient, hooks *twirp.ClientHooks, url string, in, out proto.Message) (_ context.Context, err error) {
marshaler := &protojson.MarshalOptions{UseProtoNames: true}
reqBytes, err := marshaler.Marshal(in)
if err != nil {
return ctx, wrapInternal(err, "failed to marshal json request")
Method greeterServiceServer.serveHelloJSON
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *greeterServiceServer) serveHelloJSON(ctx context.Context, resp http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var err error
ctx = ctxsetters.WithMethodName(ctx, "Hello")
ctx, err = callRequestRouted(ctx, s.hooks)
if err != nil {
Method greeterServiceServer.serveSignProtobuf
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *greeterServiceServer) serveSignProtobuf(ctx context.Context, resp http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var err error
ctx = ctxsetters.WithMethodName(ctx, "Sign")
ctx, err = callRequestRouted(ctx, s.hooks)
if err != nil {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
command := cobra.Command{
Use: "client",
Short: "client to the service",
Long: "Run service commands remotely.",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 126.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
command := cobra.Command{
Use: "server",
Short: "server of the service",
Long: "Execute remote client commands.",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 126.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (x *SignResponse) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
mi := &file_v1_service_proto_msgTypes[3]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76