Showing 33 of 62 total issues
Method <=> has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def <=>(other)
raise NoMethodError, "undefined method `<=>' for #{base_scalar.inspect}" unless base_scalar.respond_to?(:<=>)
if other.nil?
base_scalar <=> nil- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method - has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def -(other)
case other
when Unit
if zero?
if other.zero?Method == has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ==(other)
if other.respond_to?(:zero?) && other.zero?
zero?
elsif other.instance_of?(Unit)
return false unless self =~ other- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method root has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def root(n)
raise ArgumentError, "Cannot take the root of a temperature" if temperature?
raise ArgumentError, "Exponent must an Integer" unless n.is_a?(Integer)
raise ArgumentError, "0th root undefined" if n.zero?
return self if n == 1- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(name, definition = [])
yield self if block_given?
self.name ||= name.gsub(/[<>]/, "")
@aliases ||= definition[0] || [name]
@scalar ||= definition[1]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method at has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def at(*args, **kwargs)
case args.first
when RubyUnits::Unit
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : kwargs
secondary_unit = args[2] || "microsecond"- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method unit_signature_vector has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def unit_signature_vector
return to_base.unit_signature_vector unless base?
vector = ::Array.new(SIGNATURE_VECTOR.size, 0)
# it's possible to have a kind that misses the array... kinds like :counting- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method power has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def power(n)
raise ArgumentError, "Cannot raise a temperature to a power" if temperature?
raise ArgumentError, "Exponent must an Integer" unless n.is_a?(Integer)
return inverse if n == -1
return 1 if n.zero?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
returnAvoid too many return statements within this method. Open
returnAvoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return self if target.units == unitsAvoid too many return statements within this method. Open
returnMethod use_definition has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.use_definition(definition)
@unit_match_regex = nil # invalidate the unit match regex
@temp_regex = nil # invalidate the temp regex
if definition.prefix?
prefix_values[definition.name] = definition.scalar- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"