Showing 62 of 62 total issues
File unit.rb
has 1120 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require "date"
module RubyUnits
# Copyright 2006-2024
# @author Kevin C. Olbrich, Ph.D.
# @see https://github.com/olbrich/ruby-units
Class Unit
has 80 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Unit < ::Numeric
class << self
# return a list of all defined units
# @return [Hash{Symbol=>RubyUnits::Units::Definition}]
attr_accessor :definitions
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 73 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(passed_unit_string = "0")
unit_string = passed_unit_string.dup
unit_string = "#{Regexp.last_match(1)} USD" if unit_string =~ /\$\s*(#{NUMBER_REGEX})/
unit_string.gsub!("\u00b0".encode("utf-8"), "deg") if unit_string.encoding == Encoding::UTF_8
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File standard.rb
has 520 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
RubyUnits::Unit.define("inch") do |inch|
inch.definition = RubyUnits::Unit.new("254/10000 meter")
inch.aliases = %w[in inch inches "]
end
Method convert_to
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_to(other)
return self if other.nil?
return self if other.is_a?(TrueClass)
return self if other.is_a?(FalseClass)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has 138 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(passed_unit_string = "0")
unit_string = passed_unit_string.dup
unit_string = "#{Regexp.last_match(1)} USD" if unit_string =~ /\$\s*(#{NUMBER_REGEX})/
unit_string.gsub!("\u00b0".encode("utf-8"), "deg") if unit_string.encoding == Encoding::UTF_8
Method to_s
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_s(target_units = nil, precision: 0.0001, format: RubyUnits.configuration.format)
out = @output[target_units]
return out if out
separator = RubyUnits.configuration.separator
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(*options)
@scalar = nil
@base_scalar = nil
@unit_name = nil
@signature = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_base
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_base
return self if base?
if self.class.unit_map[units] =~ /\A<(?:temp|deg)[CRF]>\Z/
@signature = self.class.kinds.key(:temperature)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method units
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def units(with_prefix: true, format: nil)
return "" if @numerator == UNITY_ARRAY && @denominator == UNITY_ARRAY
output_numerator = ["1"]
output_denominator = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(*options)
@scalar = nil
@base_scalar = nil
@unit_name = nil
@signature = nil
Method convert_to
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_to(other)
return self if other.nil?
return self if other.is_a?(TrueClass)
return self if other.is_a?(FalseClass)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@denominator.compact.each do |num_unit|
if self.class.prefix_values[num_unit]
q /= self.class.prefix_values[num_unit]
else
q /= self.class.unit_values[num_unit][:scalar] if self.class.unit_values[num_unit]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@numerator.compact.each do |num_unit|
if self.class.prefix_values[num_unit]
q *= self.class.prefix_values[num_unit]
else
q *= self.class.unit_values[num_unit][:scalar] if self.class.unit_values[num_unit]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method to_s
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_s(target_units = nil, precision: 0.0001, format: RubyUnits.configuration.format)
out = @output[target_units]
return out if out
separator = RubyUnits.configuration.separator
Method -
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def -(other)
case other
when Unit
if zero?
if other.zero?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method **
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def **(other)
raise ArgumentError, "Cannot raise a temperature to a power" if temperature?
if other.is_a?(Numeric)
return inverse if other == -1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method +
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def +(other)
case other
when Unit
if zero?
other.dup
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_base
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_base
return self if base?
if self.class.unit_map[units] =~ /\A<(?:temp|deg)[CRF]>\Z/
@signature = self.class.kinds.key(:temperature)
Method units
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def units(with_prefix: true, format: nil)
return "" if @numerator == UNITY_ARRAY && @denominator == UNITY_ARRAY
output_numerator = ["1"]
output_denominator = []