Showing 28 of 36 total issues
File schema_generator.go
has 728 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package generator
import (
"errors"
"fmt"
Method schemaGenerator.generateStructType
has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateStructType(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
if len(t.Properties) == 0 {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method schemaGenerator.generateEnumType
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateEnumType(
t *schemas.Type, scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
if len(t.Enum) == 0 {
return nil, errEnumArrCannotBeEmpty
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method schemaGenerator.generateTypeInline
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateTypeInline(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
two := 2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method schemaGenerator.generateStructType
has 139 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateStructType(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
if len(t.Properties) == 0 {
Method schemaGenerator.generateEnumType
has 115 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateEnumType(
t *schemas.Type, scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
if len(t.Enum) == 0 {
return nil, errEnumArrCannotBeEmpty
Method schemaGenerator.generateReferencedType
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateReferencedType(ref string) (codegen.Type, error) {
fileName := ref
var scope, defName string
Function PrimitiveTypeFromJSONSchemaType
has 103 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func PrimitiveTypeFromJSONSchemaType(
jsType,
format string,
pointer,
minIntSize bool,
Method schemaGenerator.generateReferencedType
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateReferencedType(ref string) (codegen.Type, error) {
fileName := ref
var scope, defName string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method schemaGenerator.structFieldValidators
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) structFieldValidators(
validators []validator,
f codegen.StructField,
t codegen.Type,
isNillable bool,
Method schemaGenerator.generateType
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateType(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
typeIndex := 0
Method schemaGenerator.generateTypeInline
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateTypeInline(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
two := 2
Method schemaGenerator.structFieldValidators
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) structFieldValidators(
validators []validator,
f codegen.StructField,
t codegen.Type,
isNillable bool,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method schemaGenerator.generateType
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateType(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
typeIndex := 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method schemaGenerator.generateReferencedType
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateReferencedType(ref string) (codegen.Type, error) {
fileName := ref
var scope, defName string
Method schemaGenerator.generateType
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateType(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
typeIndex := 0
Method schemaGenerator.generateDeclaredType
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateDeclaredType(
t *schemas.Type, scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
if decl, ok := g.output.declsBySchema[t]; ok {
return &codegen.NamedType{Decl: decl}, nil
Function PrimitiveTypeFromJSONSchemaType
has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func PrimitiveTypeFromJSONSchemaType(
jsType,
format string,
pointer,
minIntSize bool,
Method schemaGenerator.generateTypeInline
has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateTypeInline(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
two := 2
Function PrimitiveTypeFromJSONSchemaType
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jsType,
format string,
pointer,
minIntSize bool,
minimum **float64,