opal/opal-browser

View on GitHub
opal/browser/dom/node.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Class Node has 56 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class Node
  include Browser::NativeCachedWrapper

  ELEMENT_NODE                = 1
  ATTRIBUTE_NODE              = 2
Severity: Major
Found in opal/browser/dom/node.rb - About 1 day to fix

    File node.rb has 306 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module Browser; module DOM
    
    # Abstract class for all DOM node types.
    #
    # @see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Node
    Severity: Minor
    Found in opal/browser/dom/node.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

      Method >> has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def >>(node)
          if Opal.respond_to? node, :each
            node.each { |n| self >> n }
            return self
          elsif Opal.respond_to? node, :to_dom
      Severity: Minor
      Found in opal/browser/dom/node.rb - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method add_next_sibling has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def add_next_sibling(node = nil, &block)
          unless node
            node = DOM(&block)
          end
          node = node.to_dom(document) if Opal.respond_to? node, :to_dom
      Severity: Minor
      Found in opal/browser/dom/node.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method add_previous_sibling has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def add_previous_sibling(node = nil, &block)
          unless node
            node = DOM(&block)
          end
          node = node.to_dom(document) if Opal.respond_to? node, :to_dom
      Severity: Minor
      Found in opal/browser/dom/node.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method new has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def self.new(value)
          if self == Node
            @classes ||= [nil, Element, Attribute, Text, CDATA, nil, nil, nil, Comment, Document, nil, DocumentFragment]
      
            if klass = @classes[`value.nodeType`]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in opal/browser/dom/node.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def add_previous_sibling(node = nil, &block)
          unless node
            node = DOM(&block)
          end
          node = node.to_dom(document) if Opal.respond_to? node, :to_dom
      Severity: Minor
      Found in opal/browser/dom/node.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
      opal/browser/dom/node.rb on lines 134..148

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 42.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def add_next_sibling(node = nil, &block)
          unless node
            node = DOM(&block)
          end
          node = node.to_dom(document) if Opal.respond_to? node, :to_dom
      Severity: Minor
      Found in opal/browser/dom/node.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
      opal/browser/dom/node.rb on lines 156..170

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 42.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status