Showing 154 of 154 total issues
Method people_and_committee_sponsors
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def people_and_committee_sponsors(opts = {})
sponsors = read_attribute(:sponsors)
case opts[:only]
when :people
sponsors.select!{|x| x['leg_id']}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function htmlTemplate
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function htmlTemplate(tagId, options) {
headline = options.headline;
summary = options.questionSummary;
body = options.questionBody;
name = options.partner.name;
Method copy_to_new_person
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def copy_to_new_person
unless Metadatum.where(id: state).first
copy_to_new_metadatum
end
Method people_and_committee_sponsors
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def people_and_committee_sponsors(opts = {})
sponsors = read_attribute(:sponsors)
case opts[:only]
when :people
sponsors.select!{|x| x['leg_id']}
Function inWords
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
inWords: function(distanceMillis) {
var $l = this.settings.strings;
var prefix = $l.prefixAgo;
var suffix = $l.suffixAgo;
if (this.settings.allowFuture) {
Method roles_from_api
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def roles_from_api(terms)
write_attribute(:roles, []) unless read_attribute(:roles)
terms.each do |term|
role = { term_years: [] }
Method sentence
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sentence(person = nil, metadatum = nil)
if ratingText?
person ||= self.person # avoid N+1 query
metadatum ||= self.metadatum # avoid N+1 query
sentence = ratingText
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method local_jurisdiction
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def local_jurisdiction
return @local_jurisdiction if @local_jurisdiction
if @jurisdiction && @jurisdiction.id.include?("-")
return @local_jurisdiction = @jurisdiction
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get(endpoint, params = {})
begin
result = JSON.parse(RestClient.get("http://api.votesmart.org/#{endpoint}", params: params.merge(key: @api_key, o: 'JSON')))
if result['error']
Function inclusion
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
inclusion: function(element, options) {
var lower, message, option, upper, _ref;
message = this.presence(element, options);
if (message) {
if (options.allow_blank === true) {
Method show
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
@user = user_signed_in? ? current_user : User.new
if params[:code]
confirmed_question = Question.where(id: params[:id])
.where(confirm_code: params[:code]).first
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (jQuery(this).data('tag-id') && jQuery(this).data('tag-id').length > 0) tagId = jQuery(this).data('tag-id');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (jQuery(this).data('tag-id') && jQuery(this).data('tag-id').length > 0) tagId = jQuery(this).data('tag-id');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (jQuery(this).data('tag-id') && jQuery(this).data('tag-id').length > 0) tagId = jQuery(this).data('tag-id');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (jQuery(this).data('tag-id') && jQuery(this).data('tag-id').length > 0) tagId = jQuery(this).data('tag-id');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function exclusion
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exclusion: function(element, options) {
var lower, message, option, upper, _ref;
message = this.presence(element, options);
if (message) {
if (options.allow_blank === true) {
Method cdn_image_tag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cdn_image_tag(url, opts = {})
if opts[:size]
width, height = opts[:size].split('x')
else
width, height = opts[:width], opts[:height]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method most_recent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def most_recent(attribute)
if read_attribute(attribute)
read_attribute(attribute)
else
read_attribute(:old_roles).to_a.reverse.each do |_, roles|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_candidates_if_referring_partner
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_candidates_if_referring_partner
return unless @has_partner
extra_state_candidates = []
people_collections.each do |name, ids|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function uniqueness
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
uniqueness: function(element, options) {
var form, matches, name, name_prefix, name_suffix, valid, value;
name = element.attr('name');
if (/_attributes\]\[\d/.test(name)) {
matches = name.match(/^(.+_attributes\])\[\d+\](.+)$/);