Sign upLogin

openrm/hato

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 12 of 16 total issues

Function getClientClass has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function getClientClass(apiClass) {
    /**
     * Internal class.
     */
    class Client extends apiClass {
Severity: Major
Found in lib/index.js - About 2 hrs to fix

    Function create has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        create() {
        const modes = [Modes.PUBLICATION, Modes.SUBSCRIPTION];
        const open = modes
            .map((mode) => this._chs[mode] = this._create(mode));
        return Promise.all(open)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in plugins/duplex.js - About 1 hr to fix

      Function exchange has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          exchange(name, type, options) {
        assert(name || type,
            'ContextChannel.exchange() requires either `name` or `type`');

        assert(!type || exchangeTypes.includes(type),
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/api.js - About 1 hr to fix

        Function connect has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        const connect = function(url, socketOptions) {
    const logger = this.logger;
    logger.debug('[AMQP] Connecting to server...');
    return promisify(amqp.connect.bind(amqp, url, socketOptions))
        .then((conn) => {
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/client.js - About 1 hr to fix

          Function consume has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              consume(binding, fn, options) {
        // allow to omit the binding key for use with fanout exchanges
        if (arguments.length === 1) return this.consume('', fn);

        assert(typeof binding === 'string' || binding &&
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/api.js - About 1 hr to fix

            Function patchChannel has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            const patchChannel = function(logger, conn, create) {
    return function() {
        logger.debug('[AMQP] Opening a channel...');
        return promisify(create.bind(conn))
            .then((ch) => {
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/client.js - About 1 hr to fix

              Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
              Open

                  if (err instanceof TypeError ||
        err instanceof ReferenceError ||
        err instanceof SyntaxError ||
        err instanceof RangeError ||
        err instanceof RetryError ||
              Severity: Critical
              Found in plugins/retry/errors.js - About 1 hr to fix

                Function retry has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    retry(retries, backoff) {
        return (connect) => {
            const retryable = (c, ...args) => {
                if (0 < c) this.logger.debug(
                    '[AMQP:conn-retry] Retrying to connect...');
                Severity: Minor
                Found in plugins/conn-retry.js - About 1 hr to fix

                  Function retryOnError has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  function retryOnError(fn, retries, computeDelay) {
    return (msg) => {
        const count = context.count(msg.properties.headers);

        if ('x-retry-limit' in msg.properties.headers) {
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in plugins/retry/index.js - About 1 hr to fix

                    Function reply has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                    function reply(ch, msg, err, res, options) {
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in plugins/rpc/api.js - About 35 mins to fix

                      Function consume has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                          consume(binding, fn, options) {
        // allow to omit the binding key for use with fanout exchanges
        if (arguments.length === 1) return this.consume('', fn);

        assert(typeof binding === 'string' || binding &&
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in lib/api.js - About 35 mins to fix

                      Cognitive Complexity

                      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                      Further reading

                      Function exchange has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                          exchange(name, type, options) {
        assert(name || type,
            'ContextChannel.exchange() requires either `name` or `type`');

        assert(!type || exchangeTypes.includes(type),
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in lib/api.js - About 25 mins to fix

                      Cognitive Complexity

                      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                      Further reading

                      Severity
                      Category
                      Status
                      Source
                      Language