Showing 254 of 254 total issues
Method user_params
has 141 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def user_params
if current_user && current_user.admin?
params.require(:user)
.permit(:name,
:avatar,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var h = new RegExp("(^" + ("" != i.negationSymbol.front ? (0, r.default)(i.negationSymbol.front) + "?" : "") + (0,
r.default)(i.prefix) + ")(.*)(" + (0, r.default)(i.suffix) + ("" != i.negationSymbol.back ? (0,
r.default)(i.negationSymbol.back) + "?" : "") + "$)").exec(n(t.slice(), !0).reverse().join(""));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 146.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var a = new RegExp("(^" + ("" !== t.negationSymbol.front ? (0, r.default)(t.negationSymbol.front) + "?" : "") + (0,
r.default)(t.prefix) + ")(.*)(" + (0, r.default)(t.suffix) + ("" != t.negationSymbol.back ? (0,
r.default)(t.negationSymbol.back) + "?" : "") + "$)").exec(e.slice().reverse().join("")), i = a ? a[2] : "", n = !1;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 146.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (t) 0 === i.indexOf("[") || d && /\\d|\\s|\\w]/i.test(i) || "." === i ? e.matches.splice(n++, 0, {
fn: new RegExp(i, a.casing ? "i" : ""),
static: !1,
optionality: !1,
newBlockMarker: void 0 === r ? "master" : r.def !== i,
Function g
has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function g(t, a, n, r) {
function o(n, r, f) {
function p(e, t) {
var a = 0 === t.matches.indexOf(e);
return a || t.matches.every((function(i, n) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (void 0 !== c) {
v = parseInt(u), S.excludes[v] = S.excludes[v] || [], !0 !== e && S.excludes[v].push((0,
n.getDecisionTaker)(p) + ":" + p.alternation);
var A = [], C = -1;
for (h = v; h < o.getLastValidPosition.call(x, void 0, !0) + 1; h++) -1 === C && e <= h && void 0 !== t && (A.push(t),
Function o
has 124 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function o(n, r, f) {
function p(e, t) {
var a = 0 === t.matches.indexOf(e);
return a || t.matches.every((function(i, n) {
return !0 === i.isQuantifier ? a = p(e, t.matches[n - 1]) : Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(i, "matches") && (a = p(e, i)),
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
rentToggle.addEventListener('change', function (event) {
console.log(`${event.target.value} is picked`);
if (event.target.value === 'Rent') {
document.getElementById('foster-rental-questions').classList.remove('collapse')
makeRentalQuestionsRequired(true)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 129.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
petsToggle.addEventListener('change', function (event) {
console.log(`${event.target.value} is picked`);
if (event.target.value === 'true') {
document.getElementById('other-pets-questions').classList.remove('collapse')
makeHasPetsQuestionsRequired(true)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 129.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (d !== f) {
var h = function(e, i, r) {
for (var o, s, l, c = e.substr(0, r.begin).split(""), f = e.substr(r.begin).split(""), d = i.substr(0, r.begin).split(""), p = i.substr(r.begin).split(""), h = c.length >= d.length ? c.length : d.length, m = f.length >= p.length ? f.length : p.length, v = "", g = [], k = "~"; c.length < h; ) c.push(k);
for (;d.length < h; ) d.push(k);
for (;f.length < m; ) f.unshift(k);
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (e[i] = "ampm" === i ? t : t.replace(/[^0-9]/g, "0"), e["raw" + i] = t, void 0 !== r) {
var n = e[i];
("day" === i && 29 === parseInt(n) || "month" === i && 2 === parseInt(n)) && (29 !== parseInt(e.day) || 2 !== parseInt(e.month) || "" !== e.year && void 0 !== e.year || e.date.setFullYear(2012, 1, 29)),
"day" === i && 0 === parseInt(n) && (n = 1), "month" === i && (n = parseInt(n)) > 0 && (n -= 1),
"year" === i && n.length < 4 && (n = y(n, 4, !0)), "" === n || isNaN(n) || r.call(e.date, n),
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (void 0 !== e) {
var i = new d.Event("_checkval");
i.which = e.toString().charCodeAt(0), m += e;
var n = o.getLastValidPosition.call(l, void 0, !0);
!function(e, t) {
Function 157
has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
157: function(e, t, a) {
Object.defineProperty(t, "__esModule", {
value: !0
}), t.mask = function() {
var e = this, t = this.opts, a = this.el, i = this.dependencyLib;
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ("function" == typeof k.preValidation && !0 !== i && !0 !== s && (S = P(S = k.preValidation.call(v, o.getBuffer.call(v), x, t, b(e), k, y, e, a || r))),
!0 === S) {
if (S = E(x, t, a), (!a || !0 === i) && !1 === S && !0 !== s) {
var _ = y.validPositions[x];
if (!_ || !0 !== _.match.static || _.match.def !== t && t !== k.skipOptionalPartCharacter) {
Function 5296
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
5296: function(e, t, a) {
function i(e) {
return (i = "function" == typeof Symbol && "symbol" == typeof Symbol.iterator ? function(e) {
return typeof e;
} : function(e) {
Function 7760
has 106 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
7760: function(e, t, a) {
Object.defineProperty(t, "__esModule", {
value: !0
}), t.applyInputValue = c, t.clearOptionalTail = f, t.checkVal = d, t.HandleNativePlaceholder = function(e, t) {
var a = e ? e.inputmask : this;
Function mask
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
}), t.mask = function() {
var e = this, t = this.opts, a = this.el, i = this.dependencyLib;
s.EventRuler.off(a);
var f = function(t, a) {
"textarea" !== t.tagName.toLowerCase() && a.ignorables.push(n.default.ENTER);
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
s.handleRemove.call(t, f, p, h), (0, l.writeBuffer)(f, n.getBuffer.call(t, !0), c.p, e, f.inputmask._valueGet() !== n.getBuffer.call(t).join("")); else if (p === r.default.END || p === r.default.PAGE_DOWN) {
e.preventDefault();
var v = n.seekNext.call(t, n.getLastValidPosition.call(t));
n.caret.call(t, f, e.shiftKey ? h.begin : v, v, !0);
} else p === r.default.HOME && !e.shiftKey || p === r.default.PAGE_UP ? (e.preventDefault(),
Function 3851
has 95 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
3851: function(e, t, a) {
var i, n = (i = a(2394)) && i.__esModule ? i : {
default: i
}, r = a(8711), o = a(4713);
n.default.extendDefinitions({
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (o.getBuffer.call(v, !0), !1 !== (s = (!f.jit || void 0 !== y.validPositions[o.seekPrevious.call(v, t)]) && (null != f.fn ? f.fn.test(a, y, t, r, k, b(e)) : (a === f.def || a === k.skipOptionalPartCharacter) && "" !== f.def && {
c: n.getPlaceholder.call(v, t, f, !0) || f.def,
pos: t
}))) {
var d = void 0 !== s.c ? s.c : a, p = t;