Showing 650 of 650 total issues
Function parseForExpression
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function parseForExpression(input, context) {
const loc = input.loc;
const exp = input.content;
const inMatch = exp.match(forAliasRE);
if (!inMatch)
Function transformText
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const transformText = (node, context) => {
if (node.type === 0 /* ROOT */ ||
node.type === 1 /* ELEMENT */ ||
node.type === 11 /* FOR */ ||
node.type === 10 /* IF_BRANCH */) {
Function setup
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup(props, { slots }) {
const link = reactive(useLink(props));
const { options } = inject(routerKey);
const elClass = computed(() => ({
[getLinkClass(
Function setupListeners
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function setupListeners() {
removeHistoryListener = routerHistory.listen((to, _from, info) => {
// cannot be a redirect route because it was in history
let toLocation = resolve(to);
// due to dynamic routing, and to hash history with manual navigation
Function renderRangeList
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
renderRangeList: function renderRangeList(rawRange, section) {
var _this10 = this;
if (!rawRange || !section || !this.isMinuteOrSecond(section)) {
return [];
Function _createForOfIteratorHelper
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _createForOfIteratorHelper(o, allowArrayLike) {
var it;
if (typeof Symbol === "undefined" || o[Symbol.iterator] == null) {
if (Array.isArray(o) || (it = _unsupportedIterableToArray(o)) || allowArrayLike && o && typeof o.length === "number") {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
["WATCH_ARRAY" /* WATCH_ARRAY */]: {
message: `"watch" option or vm.$watch on an array value will no longer ` +
`trigger on array mutation unless the "deep" option is specified. ` +
`If current usage is intended, you can disable the compat behavior and ` +
`suppress this warning with:` +
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
["TRANSITION_GROUP_ROOT" /* TRANSITION_GROUP_ROOT */]: {
message: `<TransitionGroup> no longer renders a root <span> element by ` +
`default if no "tag" prop is specified. If you do not rely on the span ` +
`for styling, you can disable the compat behavior and suppress this ` +
`warning with:` +
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function move
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const move = (vnode, container, anchor, moveType, parentSuspense = null) => {
const { el, type, transition, children, shapeFlag } = vnode;
if (shapeFlag & 6 /* COMPONENT */) {
move(vnode.component.subTree, container, anchor, moveType);
return;
Function cloneVNode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function cloneVNode(vnode, extraProps, mergeRef = false) {
// This is intentionally NOT using spread or extend to avoid the runtime
// key enumeration cost.
const { props, ref, patchFlag, children } = vnode;
const mergedProps = extraProps ? mergeProps(props || {}, extraProps) : props;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createRootCodegen
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createRootCodegen(root, context) {
const { helper, removeHelper } = context;
const { children } = root;
if (children.length === 1) {
const child = children[0];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function transformExpression
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const transformExpression = (node, context) => {
if (node.type === 5 /* INTERPOLATION */) {
node.content = processExpression(node.content, context);
}
else if (node.type === 1 /* ELEMENT */) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compileToFunction
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function compileToFunction(template, options) {
if (!isString(template)) {
if (template.nodeType) {
template = template.innerHTML;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function normalizeEmitsOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function normalizeEmitsOptions(comp, appContext, asMixin = false) {
const cache = appContext.emitsCache;
const cached = cache.get(comp);
if (cached !== undefined) {
return cached;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function useHistoryStateNavigation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function useHistoryStateNavigation(base) {
const { history, location } = window;
// private variables
let currentLocation = {
value: createCurrentLocation(base, location),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function normalizeQuery
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function normalizeQuery(query) {
const normalizedQuery = {};
for (let key in query) {
let value = query[key];
if (value !== undefined) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isEnd
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function isEnd(context, mode, ancestors) {
const s = context.source;
switch (mode) {
case 0 /* DATA */:
if (startsWith(s, '</')) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function normalizeStyle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function normalizeStyle(value) {
if (isArray(value)) {
const res = {};
for (let i = 0; i < value.length; i++) {
const item = value[i];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function useLink
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function useLink(props) {
const router = inject(routerKey);
const currentRoute = inject(routeLocationKey);
const route = computed(() => router.resolve(unref(props.to)));
const activeRecordIndex = computed(() => {
Function scrollToPosition
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function scrollToPosition(position) {
let scrollToOptions;
if ("el" in position) {
let positionEl = position.el;
const isIdSelector =