Showing 1,637 of 1,637 total issues
Function attr
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
elproto.attr = function (name, value) {
if (this.removed) {
return this;
}
if (name == null) {
Function hierarchy
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
d3.layout.hierarchy = function() {
var sort = d3_layout_hierarchySort, children = d3_layout_hierarchyChildren, value = d3_layout_hierarchyValue;
function recurse(node, depth, nodes) {
var childs = children.call(hierarchy, node, depth);
node.depth = depth;
Function tick
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
force.tick = function() {
if ((alpha *= .99) < .005) {
event.end({
type: "end",
alpha: alpha = 0
Function init
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function( selector, context, rootjQuery ) {
var match, elem;
// HANDLE: $(""), $(null), $(undefined), $(false)
if ( !selector ) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(document)
.on('click.bs.dropdown.data-api', clearMenus)
.on('click.bs.dropdown.data-api', '.dropdown form', function (e) { e.stopPropagation() })
.on('click.bs.dropdown.data-api' , toggle, Dropdown.prototype.toggle)
.on('keydown.bs.dropdown.data-api', toggle + ', [role=menu]' , Dropdown.prototype.keydown)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 81.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(document)
.on('click.dropdown.data-api touchstart.dropdown.data-api', clearMenus)
.on('click.dropdown touchstart.dropdown.data-api', '.dropdown form', function (e) { e.stopPropagation() })
.on('click.dropdown.data-api touchstart.dropdown.data-api' , toggle, Dropdown.prototype.toggle)
.on('keydown.dropdown.data-api touchstart.dropdown.data-api', toggle + ', [role=menu]' , Dropdown.prototype.keydown)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 81.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function keydown
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
keydown: function( event ) {
/*jshint maxcomplexity:25*/
var allowed, curVal, newVal, step,
index = $( event.target ).data( "ui-slider-handle-index" );
Function d3_geo_clipPolygon
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function d3_geo_clipPolygon(segments, compare, clipStartInside, interpolate, listener) {
var subject = [], clip = [];
segments.forEach(function(segment) {
if ((n = segment.length - 1) <= 0) return;
var n, p0 = segment[0], p1 = segment[n];
File 0010_plugin_data_migration.py
has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from south.utils import datetime_utils as datetime
from south.db import db
from south.v2 import DataMigration
from django.db import models
Function fnUpdate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"fnUpdate": function ( oSettings, fnDraw ) {
var iListLength = 5;
var oPaging = oSettings.oInstance.fnPagingInfo();
var an = oSettings.aanFeatures.p;
var i, j, sClass, iStart, iEnd, iHalf=Math.floor(iListLength/2);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (cx == null || cy == null) {
var bbox = this.getBBox(1);
cx = bbox.x + bbox.width / 2;
cy = bbox.y + bbox.height / 2;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (cx == null || cy == null) {
var bbox = this.getBBox(1);
cx = bbox.x + bbox.width / 2;
cy = bbox.y + bbox.height / 2;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function createWrapper
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
createWrapper: function( element ) {
// if the element is already wrapped, return it
if ( element.parent().is( ".ui-effects-wrapper" )) {
return element.parent();
Function renderRegion
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
renderRegion: function (valuenum, highlight) {
var vals = this.values[valuenum],
options = this.options,
xaxisOffset = this.xaxisOffset,
result = [],
Function fnFilter
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.fnFilter = function( sInput, iColumn, bRegex, bSmart, bShowGlobal, bCaseInsensitive )
{
var oSettings = _fnSettingsFromNode( this[DataTable.ext.iApiIndex] );
if ( !oSettings.oFeatures.bFilter )
Function _generateMonthYearHeader
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_generateMonthYearHeader: function(inst, drawMonth, drawYear, minDate, maxDate,
secondary, monthNames, monthNamesShort) {
var inMinYear, inMaxYear, month, years, thisYear, determineYear, year, endYear,
changeMonth = this._get(inst, "changeMonth"),
Function _fnColumnOptions
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _fnColumnOptions( oSettings, iCol, oOptions )
{
var oCol = oSettings.aoColumns[ iCol ];
/* User specified column options */
Function _fnGetObjectDataFn
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _fnGetObjectDataFn( mSource )
{
if ( mSource === null )
{
/* Give an empty string for rendering / sorting etc */
Function data
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.data = (function() {
var _i, _len, _results;
_results = [];
for (index = _i = 0, _len = data.length; _i < _len; index = ++_i) {
row = data[index];
Function domManip
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domManip: function( args, callback, allowIntersection ) {
// Flatten any nested arrays
args = core_concat.apply( [], args );