Showing 13 of 13 total issues
Function DruidHTTPEndpoint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 63 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func DruidHTTPEndpoint(metricsCleanupTTL int, disableHistogram bool, histogram *prometheus.HistogramVec, gauge *prometheus.GaugeVec, dnsCache *cache.Cache) http.HandlerFunc {
gaugeCleaner := newCleaner(gauge, metricsCleanupTTL)
return func(w http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var druidData []map[string]interface{}
var id string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function DruidHTTPEndpoint
has 113 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func DruidHTTPEndpoint(metricsCleanupTTL int, disableHistogram bool, histogram *prometheus.HistogramVec, gauge *prometheus.GaugeVec, dnsCache *cache.Cache) http.HandlerFunc {
gaugeCleaner := newCleaner(gauge, metricsCleanupTTL)
return func(w http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
var druidData []map[string]interface{}
var id string
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else { // Single datasource
if !disableHistogram {
histogram.With(prometheus.Labels{
"metric_name": strings.Replace(metric, "/", "-", 3),
"service": strings.Replace(service, "/", "-", 3),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 180.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for _, entryDatasource := range arrDatasource {
if !disableHistogram {
histogram.With(prometheus.Labels{
"metric_name": strings.Replace(metric, "/", "-", 3),
"service": strings.Replace(service, "/", "-", 3),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 180.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method MetricCollector.Collect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (collector *MetricCollector) Collect(ch chan<- prometheus.Metric) {
ch <- prometheus.MustNewConstMetric(collector.DruidHealthStatus,
prometheus.CounterValue, GetDruidHealthMetrics())
for _, data := range GetDruidSegmentData() {
ch <- prometheus.MustNewConstMetric(collector.DataSourceCount,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func GetDruidTasksData(pathURL string) TasksInterface {
kingpin.Parse()
druidURL := *druid + pathURL
responseData, err := utils.GetResponse(druidURL, pathURL)
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 162.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func GetDruidDataSourcesTotalRows(pathURL string) DataSourcesTotalRows {
kingpin.Parse()
druidURL := *druid + pathURL
responseData, err := utils.GetSQLResponse(druidURL, totalRowsSQL)
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 162.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method MetricCollector.Collect
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (collector *MetricCollector) Collect(ch chan<- prometheus.Metric) {
ch <- prometheus.MustNewConstMetric(collector.DruidHealthStatus,
prometheus.CounterValue, GetDruidHealthMetrics())
for _, data := range GetDruidSegmentData() {
ch <- prometheus.MustNewConstMetric(collector.DataSourceCount,
Function Collector
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func Collector() *MetricCollector {
return &MetricCollector{
DruidHealthStatus: prometheus.NewDesc("druid_health_status",
"Health of Druid, 1 is healthy 0 is not",
nil, prometheus.Labels{
Function DruidHTTPEndpoint
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func DruidHTTPEndpoint(metricsCleanupTTL int, disableHistogram bool, histogram *prometheus.HistogramVec, gauge *prometheus.GaugeVec, dnsCache *cache.Cache) http.HandlerFunc {
Function GetHealth
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func GetHealth(url string) float64 {
kingpin.Parse()
client, err := generateTLSConfig()
if err != nil {
logrus.Errorf("Cannot generate http client: %v", err)
Function GetSQLResponse
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func GetSQLResponse(url string, query string) ([]byte, error) {
kingpin.Parse()
client, err := generateTLSConfig()
if err != nil {
logrus.Errorf("Cannot generate http client: %v", err)
Function generateTLSConfig
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func generateTLSConfig() (*http.Client, error) {
kingpin.Parse()
if *certFile != "" && *keyFile != "" && *caFile != "" {
cert, err := tls.LoadX509KeyPair(*certFile, *keyFile)